Abstract:TODO comments play an important role in helping developers to manage their tasks and communicate with other team members. TODO comments are often introduced by developers as a type of technical debt, such as a reminder to add/remove features or a request to optimize the code implementations. These can all be considered as notifications for developers to revisit regarding the current suboptimal solutions. TODO comments often bring short-term benefits – higher productivity or shorter development cost – and indicate attention needs to be paid for the long-term software quality. Unfortunately, due to their lack of knowledge or experience and/or the time constraints, developers sometimes may forget or even not be aware of suboptimal implementations. The loss of the TODO comments for these suboptimal solutions may hurt the software quality and reliability in the long-term. Therefore it is beneficial to remind the developers of the suboptimal solutions whenever they change the code. In this work, we refer this problem to the task of detecting TODO-missed commits , and we propose a novel approach named TDR eminder ( T O D O comment Reminder ) to address the task. With the help of TDR eminder , developers can identify possible missing TODO commits just-in-time when submitting a commit. Our approach has two phases: offline training and online inference. We first embed code change and commit message into contextual vector representations using two neural encoders respectively. The association between these representations is learned by our model automatically.In the online inference phase, TDR eminder leverages the trained model to compute the likelihood of a commit being a TODO-missed commit . We evaluate TDR eminder on datasets crawled from 10k popular Python and Java repositories in GitHub respectively. Our experimental results show that TDR eminder outperforms a set of benchmarks by a large margin in TODO-missed commits detection. Moreover, to better help developers use TDR eminder in practice, we have incorporated Large Language Models (LLMs) with our approach to provide explainable recommendations. The user study shows that our tool can effectively inform developers not only “when” to add TODOs, but also “where” and “what” TODOs should be added, verifying the value of our tool in practical application.

TASK CONTEXT: A Tool for Predicting Code Context Models for Software Development Tasks

A Smart Context-Aware Program Assistant Based on Dynamic Programming Event Modeling

Just-In-Time TODO-Missed Commits Detection

Early Prediction of Merged Code Changes to Prioritize Reviewing Tasks

Learning Code Context Information to Predict Comment Locations

ContextModule: Improving Code Completion via Repository-level Contextual Information

Enhancing LLM-Based Coding Tools through Native Integration of IDE-Derived Static Context

Task-Oriented API Usage Examples Prompting Powered By Programming Task Knowledge Graph

xPACE and TASC Modeler: Tool support for data-driven context modeling

Context-Focused Prompt Tuning Pre-Trained Code Models to Improve Code Summarization

ReACC: A Retrieval-Augmented Code Completion Framework

Exploring and Improving Code Completion for Test Code

Contextual Information Enhanced Source Code Summarization

Contextual Recommendation of Relevant Program Elements in an Interactive Feature Location Process

A Language Model for Statements of Software Code

CoCoMIC: Code Completion By Jointly Modeling In-file and Cross-file Context

Opportunities and Challenges in Code Search Tools

Better Context Makes Better Code Language Models: A Case Study on Function Call Argument Completion

DroidCoder: Enhanced Android Code Completion with Context-Enriched Retrieval-Augmented Generation

XCoS: Explainable Code Search Based on Query Scoping and Knowledge Graph

Enriching Source Code with Contextual Data for Code Completion Models: An Empirical Study