Abstract:The impact of software vulnerabilities on everyday software systems is concerning. Although deep learning-based models have been proposed for vulnerability detection, their reliability remains a significant concern. While prior evaluation of such models reports impressive recall/F1 scores of up to 99%, we find that these models underperform in practical scenarios, particularly when evaluated on the entire codebases rather than only the fixing commit. In this paper, we introduce a comprehensive dataset (Real-Vul) designed to accurately represent real-world scenarios for evaluating vulnerability detection models. We evaluate DeepWukong, LineVul, ReVeal, and IVDetect vulnerability detection approaches and observe a surprisingly significant drop in performance, with precision declining by up to 95 percentage points and F1 scores dropping by up to 91 percentage points. A closer inspection reveals a substantial overlap in the embeddings generated by the models for vulnerable and uncertain samples (non-vulnerable or vulnerability not reported yet), which likely explains why we observe such a large increase in the quantity and rate of false positives. Additionally, we observe fluctuations in model performance based on vulnerability characteristics (e.g., vulnerability types and severity). For example, the studied models achieve 26 percentage points better F1 scores when vulnerabilities are related to information leaks or code injection rather than when vulnerabilities are related to path resolution or predictable return values. Our results highlight the substantial performance gap that still needs to be bridged before deep learning-based vulnerability detection is ready for deployment in practical settings. We dive deeper into why models underperform in realistic settings and our investigation revealed overfitting as a key issue. We address this by introducing an augmentation technique, potentially improving performance by up to 30%. We contribute (a) an approach to creating a dataset that future research can use to improve the practicality of model evaluation; (b) Real-Vul– a comprehensive dataset that adheres to this approach; and (c) empirical evidence that the deep learning-based models struggle to perform in a real-world setting.

Enhancing Deep Learning-based Vulnerability Detection by Building Behavior Graph Model

Function-Level Vulnerability Detection Through Fusing Multi-Modal Knowledge

Ignnvd: A Novel Software Vulnerability Detection Model Based on Integrated Graph Neural Networks

VDDL: A Deep Learning-Based Vulnerability Detection Model for Smart Contracts.

Vul-LMGNNs: Fusing Language Models and Online-Distilled Graph Neural Networks for Code Vulnerability Detection

Toward Improved Deep Learning-based Vulnerability Detection

Learning-based Models for Vulnerability Detection: An Extensive Study

Software Vulnerability Detection via Deep Learning over Disaggregated Code Graph Representation

VDDA: An Effective Software Vulnerability Detection Model Based on Deep Learning and Attention Mechanism

VulGraB: Graph‐embedding‐based code vulnerability detection with bi‐directional gated graph neural network

Boosting the Capability of Intelligent Vulnerability Detection by Training in a Human-Learning Manner

Deep Learning based Vulnerability Detection: Are We There Yet?

VulANalyzeR: Explainable Binary Vulnerability Detection with Multi-task Learning and Attentional Graph Convolution

Dataflow Analysis-Inspired Deep Learning for Efficient Vulnerability Detection

Revisiting the Performance of Deep Learning-Based Vulnerability Detection on Realistic Datasets

An extensive study of the effects of different deep learning models on code vulnerability detection in Python code

Vul-RAG: Enhancing LLM-based Vulnerability Detection via Knowledge-level RAG

Towards Making Deep Learning-based Vulnerability Detectors Robust

VulDetectBench: Evaluating the Deep Capability of Vulnerability Detection with Large Language Models

VulDeePecker: A Deep Learning-Based System for Vulnerability Detection

Graph Confident Learning for Software Vulnerability Detection