Description of Sequential Risky Decision-Making Choices in Human-Machine Teams Using Eye-Tracking and Decision Tree.

Wei Xiong,Chen Wang,Liang Ma
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-35741-1_35
2023-01-01
Abstract:Human-machine collaboration has shown great potential in sequential risky decision-making (SRDM). Human decision-makers made their decisions depending on the condition and their machine teammates. This paper aimed to explore attentional behaviors and decision-making processes under two human-machine collaboration contexts. To this end, 25 participants were asked to complete a modified Balloon Analog Risk Task with a highly accurate machine under different human-machine teams (HMTs). We collected and analyzed task performance, decision-making choices, eye-tracking data and subjective data. We employed the decision tree algorithm to describe decision-making processes and tested the performance through resubstitution validation and train-test validation. We found that both HMTs achieved comparable performance. Participants in the human-dominated team paid more attention to the machine-recommended value while participants in the human-machine joint team paid more attention to the inflation information of the machine. There were significant associations between choice ratios of inflation alternatives and decision choices for most subjects in both HMTs. In the human-machine joint team, we found a correlation between task profits and the fixation count on machine recommended value (r = 0.40, p = 0.05), and a correlation between the number of total explosions and the fixation count on whether the machine recommending to pump or not (r = -0.36, p = 0.07). Decision tree algorithm could cover and describe at least 67% of the decision-making choices and performed differently when subjects took different strategies. Our results revealed that eye-tracking and decision tree can be potential tools to describe and understand human SRDM behaviors.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?