Promote or Restrict? A Co-design Practice of a Palliative Care Information Management System in China.

Yue Jiang,Jing Chen,Qi Chen,Long Liu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-35748-0_5
2023-01-01
Abstract:Palliative care is a multidisciplinary clinical practice focusing on the relief of suffering, psychosocial support, and closure near the end of life. However, unique palliative care challenges require a more agile, effective, and intelligent management method. This article explores how to design, develop, evaluate (1st test and 2nd test), and iterate a whole course information management system for palliative care (named Multidisciplinary Life Care System, MLS), under the guidance of a medical innovation frame (Eagle Model), a medical co-design methodology (MeX), usability scales (SUS and HUS), based on the practice in Linfen Community Health Service Center, Shanghai, China. The iteration by co-design was arranged between two tests, to longitudinally demonstrate the impact of it. The results show: (1) Users with different educational backgrounds significantly differ in the usability feedback after co-design (F = 5.887, p < 0.05). (2) The total usability score is negatively correlated with HUS (1st test: r = -0.664, p < 0.01) (2nd test: r = -0.454, p < 0.05). (3) Users’ perception of technical support (t = 2.918, p < 0.01) and consistency of the system (t = 2.389, p < 0.05) have been observably improved after co-design. (4) There is no statistically significant change in the total SUS score (t = 1.356, p > 0.05) or HUS score (t = 0.561, p > 0.05) after co-design.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?