Abstract:Differential privacy (DP), as a rigorous mathematical definition quantifying privacy leakage, has become a well-accepted standard for privacy protection. Combined with powerful machine learning (ML) techniques, differentially private machine learning (DPML) is increasingly important. As the most classic DPML algorithm, DP-SGD incurs a significant loss of utility, which hinders DPML's deployment in practice. Many studies have recently proposed improved algorithms based on DP-SGD to mitigate utility loss. However, these studies are isolated and cannot comprehensively measure the performance of improvements proposed in algorithms. More importantly, there is a lack of comprehensive research to compare improvements in these DPML algorithms across utility, defensive capabilities, and generalizability. We fill this gap by performing a holistic measurement of improved DPML algorithms on utility and defense capability against membership inference attacks (MIAs) on image classification tasks. We first present a taxonomy of where improvements are located in the ML life cycle. Based on our taxonomy, we jointly perform an extensive measurement study of the improved DPML algorithms, over twelve algorithms, four model architectures, four datasets, two attacks, and various privacy budget configurations. We also cover state-of-the-art label differential privacy (Label DP) algorithms in the evaluation. According to our empirical results, DP can effectively defend against MIAs, and sensitivity-bounding techniques such as per-sample gradient clipping play an important role in defense. We also explore some improvements that can maintain model utility and defend against MIAs more effectively. Experiments show that Label DP algorithms achieve less utility loss but are fragile to MIAs. ML practitioners may benefit from these evaluations to select appropriate algorithms. To support our evaluation, we implement a modular re-usable software, DPMLBench,(1) which enables sensitive data owners to deploy DPML algorithms and serves as a benchmark tool for researchers and practitioners.

Data Heterogeneity Differential Privacy: From Theory to Algorithm.

Rethinking Improved Privacy-Utility Trade-off with Pre-existing Knowledge for DP Training

A(DP)$^2$SGD: Asynchronous Decentralized Parallel Stochastic Gradient Descent with Differential Privacy

DPDR: Gradient Decomposition and Reconstruction for Differentially Private Deep Learning

Fair Differential Privacy Can Mitigate the Disparate Impact on Model Accuracy

A(DP)$^2$2SGD: Asynchronous Decentralized Parallel Stochastic Gradient Descent with Differential Privacy

DPMLBench: Holistic Evaluation of Differentially Private Machine Learning

Individual Privacy Accounting for Differentially Private Stochastic Gradient Descent

Differential Privacy for Class-based Data: A Practical Gaussian Mechanism

A Stochastic Gradient Descent Algorithm Based on Adaptive Differential Privacy

Differentially-Private Deep Learning with Directional Noise

Optimal Differentially Private Model Training with Public Data

Just Keep Your Concerns Private: Guaranteeing Heterogeneous Privacy and Achieving High Availability for ERM Algorithms

Dynamic Differential-Privacy Preserving SGD

DP-EPSO: Differential privacy protection algorithm based on differential evolution and particle swarm optimization

Differentially Private Deep Learning with Iterative Gradient Descent Optimization

Adaptive Distributed Differential Privacy with SGD

Differential Privacy of Noisy (S)GD under Heavy-Tailed Perturbations

GReDP: A More Robust Approach for Differential Private Training with Gradient-Preserving Noise Reduction

Differentially Private ERM Based on Data Perturbation

DPIS: An Enhanced Mechanism for Differentially Private SGD with Importance Sampling