Abstract:Deep learning (DL) models are inherently vulnerable to adversarial examples - maliciously crafted inputs to trigger target DL models to misbehave - which significantly hinders the application of DL in security-sensitive domains. Intensive research on adversarial learning has led to an arms race between adversaries and defenders. Such plethora of emerging attacks and defenses raise many questions: Which attacks are more evasive, preprocessing-proof, or transferable? Which defenses are more effective, utility-preserving, or general? Are ensembles of multiple defenses more robust than individuals? Yet, due to the lack of platforms for comprehensive evaluation on adversarial attacks and defenses, these critical questions remain largely unsolved. In this paper, we present the design, implementation, and evaluation of DEEPSEC, a uniform platform that aims to bridge this gap. In its current implementation, DEEPSEC incorporates 16 state-of-the-art attacks with 10 attack utility metrics, and 13 state-of-the-art defenses with 5 defensive utility metrics. To our best knowledge, DEEPSEC is the first platform that enables researchers and practitioners to (i) measure the vulnerability of DL models, (ii) evaluate the effectiveness of various attacks/defenses, and (iii) conduct comparative studies on attacks/defenses in a comprehensive and informative manner. Leveraging DEEPSEC, we systematically evaluate the existing adversarial attack and defense methods, and draw a set of key findings, which demonstrate DEEPSEC's rich functionality, such as (1) the trade-off between misclassification and imperceptibility is empirically confirmed; (2) most defenses that claim to be universally applicable can only defend against limited types of attacks under restricted settings; (3) it is not necessary that adversarial examples with higher perturbation magnitude are easier to be detected; (4) the ensemble of multiple defenses cannot improve the overall defense capability, but can improve the lower bound of the defense effectiveness of individuals. Extensive analysis on DEEPSEC demonstrates its capabilities and advantages as a benchmark platform which can benefit future adversarial learning research.

A Convenient Deep Learning Model Attack and Defense Evaluation Analysis Platform.

Attack As Defense: Characterizing Adversarial Examples Using Robustness.

D-DAE: Defense-Penetrating Model Extraction Attacks.

DEEPSEC: A Uniform Platform for Security Analysis of Deep Learning Model.

Towards Security Threats of Deep Learning Systems: A Survey

From Attack to Defense: Insights into Deep Learning Security Measures in Black-Box Settings

Security Comparison of Machine Learning Models Facing Different Attack Targets.

Adversarial Attacks and Defenses in Deep Learning: From a Perspective of Cybersecurity

A Universal Defense Strategy Against Adversarial Attacks Based on Attention-Guided

$A^{3}D$: A Platform of Searching for Robust Neural Architectures and Efficient Adversarial Attacks

D etect S ec : Evaluating the robustness of object detection models to adversarial attacks

DetectS Ec: Evaluating the Robustness of Object Detection Models to Adversarial Attacks

SecurityNet: Assessing Machine Learning Vulnerabilities on Public Models

How to Defend and Secure Deep Learning Models Against Adversarial Attacks in Computer Vision: A Systematic Review

Adversarial Attacks on ML Defense Models Competition

Security Risks in Deep Learning Implementations

Defenses in Adversarial Machine Learning: A Survey

On Security Weaknesses and Vulnerabilities in Deep Learning Systems

Mitigating Deep Learning Vulnerabilities from Adversarial Examples Attack in the Cybersecurity Domain

Security and Privacy Challenges in Deep Learning Models

A Review of Deep Learning Security and Privacy Defensive Techniques