Abstract:<p>Multi-attribute decision making has become a topic of interest for scholars because it can comprehensively and effectively be used to make decisions in situations in which there are multiple homogeneous options. Attribute weighting is an important step and has a significant impact on decision-making, and the subjective weighting method is commonly used in reality. However, as experts have different knowledge, experiences, preferences and so on, the weights of attributes given by experts are subjective. So expert credibility affects the final weights, and the correctness of the weights calculated in this case cannot be guaranteed. Therefore, the dynamic expert credibility model (DECM) is proposed. First, based on the decision matrix and the weight evaluation matrix, the method for calculating distance-based expert credibility calculates the distance between expert evaluations via the score deviation and ranking deviation. Second, considering the differences in the weight evaluation matrix caused by changes in the individual background of the experts, the expert background change process (EBCP) is proposed. Third, the dynamic value of credibility before and after the EBCP can be calculated. To prove the validity of the model, a test method is proposed from the perspective of data envelopment analysis. Finally, evaluations on industrial economic benefits of 16 provinces or municipalities in China are conducted to illustrate the applicability of the proposed model in practice. Using the test, DECM effectively eliminates the influence of the weight calculation due to expert credibility. After the EBCP, the target value of the DECM reaches 6.0989 and the validity of attribute weights is improved by 2.30%. Compared with the traditional weight determination method, the decision-making result under the DECM is consistent.</p>

Improved Fuzzy Evidential DEMATEL Method Based on Two-Dimensional Correlation Coefficient and Negation Evidence

An Improved Belief Entropy and Its Application in Decision-Making

A Method of Inducing Ordered Basic Belief Assignment and Its Application in Risk Assessment of Tailing Dam

A Modified Belief Entropy in Dempster-Shafer Framework

Fusion of expert uncertain assessment in FMEA based on the negation of basic probability assignment and evidence distance

A novel alpha-level sets based fuzzy DEMATEL method considering experts’ hesitant information

A new DEMATEL method based on interval type-2 fuzzy sets for developing causal relationship of knowledge management criteria

An Improved Failure Mode and Effects Analysis Method Using Belief Jensen–Shannon Divergence and Entropy Measure in the Evidence Theory

Modified Evidence Combination Method Based on Pignistic Probability Distance and Uncertainty Degree

Evidential Supplier Selection Based on DEMATEL and Game Theory

Multi-attribute decision making: An innovative method based on the dynamic credibility of experts

An Improved Method for Combining Conflicting Evidences Based on the Similarity Measure and Belief Function Entropy

DPT: An importance-based decision probability transformation method for uncertain belief in evidence theory

Enhancing fuzzy evidential reasoning approach using dynamic adjustment mechanism and new rule-based transformation for engineering emergency response evaluation

Maximum-Entropy-Based Decision-Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory and Its Application in Emergency Management

An Evidential Software Risk Evaluation Model

A Dynamic Interaction Assessment Method for Disaster Management Based on Extended DEMATEL

Failure mode and effect analysis using multi‐linguistic terms and Dempster–Shafer evidence theory

A novel uncertainty modeling method in complex evidence theory for decision making

Combining conflicting evidence based on Pearson correlation coefficient and weighted graph