Abstract:Assertions have been the de facto collateral for simulation-based and formal verification of hardware designs for over a decade. The quality of hardware verification, \ie, detection and diagnosis of corner-case design bugs, is critically dependent on the quality of the assertions. There has been a considerable amount of research leveraging a blend of data-driven statistical analysis and static analysis to generate high-quality assertions from hardware design source code and design execution trace data. Despite such concerted effort, all prior research struggles to scale to industrial-scale large designs, generates too many low-quality assertions, often fails to capture subtle and non-trivial design functionality, and does not produce any easy-to-comprehend explanations of the generated assertions to understand assertions' suitability to different downstream validation tasks. Recently, with the advent of Large-Language Models (LLMs), there has been a widespread effort to leverage prompt engineering to generate assertions. However, there is little effort to quantitatively establish the effectiveness and suitability of various LLMs for assertion generation. In this paper, we present AssertionBench, a novel benchmark to evaluate LLMs' effectiveness for assertion generation quantitatively. AssertioBench contains 100 curated Verilog hardware designs from OpenCores and formally verified assertions for each design generated from GoldMine and HARM. We use AssertionBench to compare state-of-the-art LLMs to assess their effectiveness in inferring functionally correct assertions for hardware designs. Our experiments demonstrate how LLMs perform relative to each other, the benefits of using more in-context exemplars in generating a higher fraction of functionally correct assertions, and the significant room for improvement for LLM-based assertion generators.

Towards Accelerating Assertion Coverage Using Surrogate Logic Models

Temporal Coverage Analysis for Dynamic Verification.

Improve Model Testing by Integrating Bounded Model Checking and Coverage Guided Fuzzing

Efficient Mutation-Analysis Coverage For Constrained Random Verification

Directed Test Generation for Activation of Security Assertions in RTL Models

quAssert: Automatic Generation of Quantum Assertions

HSTCG: State-Aware Simulink Model Test Case Generation with Heuristic Strategy

Novel Test Analysis To Improve Structural Coverage -A Commercial Experiment

AssertionBench: A Benchmark to Evaluate Large-Language Models for Assertion Generation

STCG: State-Aware Test Case Generation for Simulink Models.

Synthesizing Method Sequences for High-Coverage Testing

Guided test generation for coverage criteria

Automatic Generation of High-Coverage Tests for RTL Designs using Software Techniques and Tools

Statistical Verification of Autonomous Systems using Surrogate Models and Conformal Inference

Towards Code Generation from Design Models.

Formal Approach To Assertion-Based Code Generation

State of the art: Dynamic symbolic execution for automated test generation

Grammar-based fuzz testing for microprocessor RTL design

Using model checking to generate test cases for class testing

Database state generation via dynamic symbolic execution for coverage criteria.

Hardware/Software Co-verification Using Path-based Symbolic Execution