XCO<sub>2</sub> in an emission hot-spot region: the COCCON Paris campaign 2015

Felix R. Vogel,Matthias Frey,Johannes Staufer,Frank Hase,Gregoire Broquet,Irene Xueref-Remy,Frederic Chevallier,Philippe Ciais,Mahesh Kumar Sha,Pascale Chelin,Pascal Jeseck,Christof Janssen,Yao-Veng Te,Jochen Groß,Thomas Blumenstock,Qiansi Tu,Johannes Orphal
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2018-595
2018-01-01
Abstract:Abstract. Providing timely information on urban Greenhouse-Gas (GHG) emissions and their trends to stakeholders relies on reliable measurements of atmospheric concentrations and the understanding of how local emissions and atmospheric transport influence these observations. Portable Fourier Transform Infra-Red (FTIR) spectrometers were deployed at 5 stations in the Paris metropolitan area to provide column-averaged concentrations of CO2 (XCO2) during a field campaign in spring of 2015. Here, we describe and analyze the variations of XCO2 observed at different sites and how they changed over time. We find that observations upwind and downwind of the city centre differ significantly in their XCO2 concentrations, while the overall variability of the daily cycle is similar, i.e., increasing during night-time with a strong decrease (typically 2–3 ppm) during the afternoon. An atmospheric transport model framework (CHIMERE-CAMS) was used to simulate XCO2 and predict the same behaviour seen in the observations, which supports key findings, e.g. that even in a densely populated region like Paris (over 12 Million people), biospheric uptake of CO2 can be of major influence on daily XCO2 variations. Despite a general offset between modelled and observed XCO2, the model correctly predicts the impact of the meteorological parameters (e.g. wind direction and speed) on the concentration gradients between different stations. Looking at the local gradients of XCO2 for upwind and downwind station pairs, which is less sensitive to changes in XCO2 regional background conditions, we find the model-data agreement significantly better. Our modelling framework indicates that the local XCO2 gradient between the stations is dominated by the fossil fuel CO2 signal of the Paris metropolitan area. This highlights the usefulness of XCO2 observations to help optimise future urban GHG emission estimates.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?