Abstract:Human perception has long been a critical subject of design thinking. While various studies have stressed the link between thinking and acting, particularly in spatial experience, the term "design thinking" seems to disconnect conceptual thinking from physical expression or process. Spatial perception is multimodal and fundamentally bound to the body that is not a mere receptor of sensory stimuli but an active agent engaged with the perceivable environment. The body apprehends the experience in which one's kinesthetic engagement and knowledge play an essential role. Although design disciplines have integrated the abstract, metaphoric, and visual aspects of the body and its movement into conceptual thinking, studies have pointed out that design disciplines have emphasized visuality above the other sensory domains and heavily engaged with the perception of visual configurations, relying on the Gestalt principles. Gestalt psychology must be valued for its attention to a whole. However, the theories of design elements and principles over-empathizing such visuality posit the aesthetics of design mainly as visual value and understate other sensorial and perceptual aspects. Although the visual approach may provide a practical means to represent and communicate ideas, a design process heavily driven by visuality can exhibit weaknesses undermining certain aspects of spatial experience despite the complexity. Grounded in Merleau-Ponty's notion of multisensory perception, this article discusses the relationship between body awareness and spatial perception and its implication for design disciplines concerning built environments. Special attention is given to the concepts of kinesthetic and synesthetic phenomena known as multisensory and cross-sensory, respectively. This discussion integrates the corporeal and spatiotemporal realms of human experience into the discourse of kinesthetic and synesthetic perceptions. Based on the conceptual, theoretical, and precedent analyses, this article proposes three models for design thinking: Synesthetic Translation, Kinesthetic Resonance, and Kinesthetic Engagement. To discuss the concepts rooted in action-based perception and embodied cognition, this study borrows the neurological interpretation of haptic perception, interoception, and proprioception of space. This article suggests how consideration of the kinesthetic or synesthetic body can deepen and challenge the existing models of the perceptual aspects of environmental psychology adopted in design disciplines.

Types of Tactile Synaesthesia Metaphor and Its Constructive Condition

Synaesthesia, Associations and Cognition

A case for metonymic synesthesia

Novel metaphor and embodiment: comprehending novel synesthetic metaphors

Linguistic synesthesia is metaphorical: a lexical-conceptual account

Synesthesia in Multimodal Perceptual Image as a Result of Conceptual Integration (descriptive register of the English literary text)

Tangible Light: Back to Metaphor-Based Interaction

Synesthetic Correspondence: An Overview

Types of Synesthesia in B. Pasternak’s Story “Childhood Luvers” (“Childhood Eyelets”)

Semantically Layered Structure of Tactile Textures

Seeing With Your Tongue? How The Brain Uses Multiple Senses At Once

Synesthesia in a congenitally blind individual

Taste Metaphors Ground Emotion Concepts Through the Shared Attribute of Valence

Synaesthesia, the arts and creativity: a neurological connection

Why we are not all synesthetes (not even weakly so)

The advantage of being a synesthete: the behavioral benefits of ticker-tape synesthesia

Synesthesia, Then and Now

Synesthesia, transformation and synthesis: toward a multi-sensory pedagogy of the image

Subtitled speech: the neural mechanisms of ticker-tape synaesthesia

Body and the Senses in Spatial Experience: The Implications of Kinesthetic and Synesthetic Perceptions for Design Thinking

Syntactical Organization of Statements with Chains of Tactile Adjectives in Polymodal Perception