Abstract:Objective:To evaluate the influence of the shell angle of cervical artificial disc on long-term effectiveness of cervical artificial disc replacement (CADR). Methods:The clinical data of 71 patients who were treated with single-level CADR with Bryan prosthesis between December 2003 and December 2007 and followed up more than 10 years, were retrospectively analyzed. There were 44 males and 27 females with an age of 26-69 years (mean, 45.9 years). According to the shell angle of the cervical artificial disc which was measured on the postoperative lateral X-ray film, the patients were divided into kyphotic group (shell angle was negative) and non-kyphotic group. The following evaluation indexes before operation and at last follow-up were compared between 2 groups. Radiographic indexes included the range of motion (ROM) of cervical spine, the ROM of operated level, Cobb angle of operated level (the negative value indicated that the segmental kyphosis occurred at operated level), paravertebral ossification (PO) grades (grades 3 and 4 were high grade PO). Clinical indexes included Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score, neck disability index (NDI), and overall effectiveness evaluation (Odom criteria). Results:There were 24 patients in kyphotic group and 47 patients in non-kyphotic group. There was no significant difference in baseline data including gender, age, and operated level between 2 groups ( P>0.05). All the patients in 2 groups were followed up 121-165 months (mean, 128 months). There was no significant difference in preoperative ROM of cervical spine and ROM of operated level between 2 groups ( P>0.05); but the preoperative Cobb angle of operated level in kyphosis group was significantly lower than that in non-kyphotic group ( t=2.636, P=0.013). There was no significant difference in ROM of cervical spine at last follow-up between 2 groups ( t=1.393, P=0.168), however, the ROM and the Cobb angle of operated level in kyphotic group were significantly lower than those in non-kyphotic group ( P<0.05). According to the Cobb angle of operated level at last follow-up, there were 9 patients (37.5%) with segmental kyphosis in kyphotic group and 7 patients (14.9%) in non-kyphotic group, showing significant difference ( χ2=4.651, P=0.031). There was a significant difference in PO grades between 2 groups ( Z=2.894, P=0.004) at last follow-up. In kyphotic group, there were 10 patients (41.7%) with low grade PO and 14 patients (58.3%) with high grade PO; and in non-kyphosis group, there were 36 patients (76.6%) with low grade PO and 11 patients (23.4%) with high grade PO. There was no significant difference in JOA scores and NDI before operation and at last follow-up, and the JOA improvement rate, NDI decline, and Odom criteria score at last follow-up between 2 groups ( P>0.05). Conclusion:The shell angle of cervical artificial disc may lead to a decrease in the postoperative segmental ROM, and an increased occurrence of segmental kyphosis and high incidence of PO.

Is Cervical Disc Arthroplasty an Effective Treatment for Cervical Degenerative Disease with Osteopenia?

Antagonistic effects of ultra-low-molecular-weight heparin on Aβ25–35-induced apoptosis in cultured rat cortical neurons

Motion Analysis of Single‐Level Cervical Total Disc Arthroplasty: A Meta‐Analysis

Cervical disc arthroplasty versus fusion for single-level symptomatic cervical disc disease: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Cervical disc arthroplasty: What we know in 2020 and a literature review

Cervical Disc Arthroplasty for the Treatment of Noncontiguous Cervical Degenerative Disc Disease: Results of Mid‐ to Long‐Term Follow‐up

Medium and long term result of the single level cervical disc arthroplasty for cervical spondylosis meylopathy

Are Patients With Segmental Cervical Kyphosis Appropriate Candidates for Cervical Disc Arthroplasty (CDA)? A Clinical and Radiographic Analysis Compared to Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion (ACDF)

Outcomes following two-level Cervical Disc Arthroplasty Relative to two-level Anterior Cervical Discectomy

One-Level Versus 2-Level Treatment With Cervical Disc Arthroplasty or Fusion: Outcomes Up to 7 Years

Anterior bone loss after cervical Bryan disc arthroplasty: insight into the biomechanics following total disc replacement

Initial exploration of clinical outcomes of consecutive two-level cervical artificial disc replacement

Impact of cervical disc herniation combined with mild ossification on range of motion after cervical artificial disc replacement

Could Self-Locking Stand-Alone Cage Reduce Adjacent-Level Ossification Development after Aneterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion?

[Long-Term Efficacy of Cervical Artificial Disc Replacement for Cervical Degenerative Diseases].

Long-term Outcomes of Cervical Artificial Disc Replacement for Patients with Degenerative Cervical Canal Stenosis

More anterior bone loss in middle vertebra after contiguous two-segment cervical disc arthroplasty

[Analysis of Influence of Shell Angle of Cervical Artificial Disc on Long-Term Effectiveness of Cervical Artificial Disc Replacement].

Comparison of the Clinical and Radiographic Results Between Cervical Artificial Disk Replacement and Anterior Cervical Fusion A 6-Year Prospective Nonrandomized Comparative Study

Comparison of the Mid-Term Follow-Up Results Between Bryan Cervical Artificial Disc Replacement and Anterior Cervical Decompression and Fusion for Cervical Degenerative Disc Disease

ASPIRATION BIOPSY: TECHNIQUE AND APPLICATION