Abstract:Purpose Interdisciplinarity is a hot topic in science and technology policy. However, the concept of interdisciplinarity is both abstract and complex, and therefore difficult to measure using a single indicator. A variety of metrics for measuring the diversity and interdisciplinarity of articles, journals, and fields have been proposed in the literature. In this article, we ask whether institutions can be ranked in terms of their (inter-)disciplinary diversity. Design/methodology/approach We developed a software application (interd_vb.exe) that outputs the values of relevant diversity indicators for any document set or network structure. The software is made available, free to the public, online. The indicators it considers include the advanced diversity indicators Rao-Stirling ( RS ) diversity and DIV* , as well as standard measures of diversity, such as the Gini coefficient, Shannon entropy, and the Simpson Index. As an empirical demonstration of how the application works, we compared the research portfolios of 42 “Double First-Class” Chinese universities across Web of Science Subject Categories (WCs). Findings The empirical results suggest that DIV* provides results that are more in line with one's intuitive impressions than RS , particularly when the results are based on sample-dependent disparity measures. Furthermore, the scores for diversity are more consistent when based on a global disparity matrix than on a local map. Research limitations “Interdisciplinarity” can be operationalized as bibliographic coupling among (sets of) documents with references to disciplines. At the institutional level, however, diversity may also indicate comprehensiveness. Unlike impact (e.g. citation), diversity and interdisciplinarity are context-specific and therefore provide a second dimension to the evaluation. Policy or practical implications Operationalization and quantification make it necessary for analysts to make their choices and options clear. Although the equations used to calculate diversity are often mathematically transparent, the specification in terms of computer code helps the analyst to further precision in decisions. Although diversity is not necessarily a goal of universities, a high diversity score may inform potential policies concerning interdisciplinarity at the university level. Originality/value This article introduces a non-commercial online application to the public domain that allows researchers and policy analysts to measure “diversity” and “interdisciplinarity” using the various indicators as encompassing as possible for any document set or network structure (e.g. a network of co-authors). Insofar as we know, such a professional computing tool for evaluating data sets using diversity indicators has not yet been made available online.

Analyzing SPRU ’ S Research Capabilities : A Mixed Survey-Bibliometric Method for Mapping Interdisciplinary Organizations

Journal Maps, Interactive Overlays, and the Measurement of Interdisciplinarity on the Basis of Scopus Data (1996-2012)

Mapping Interdisciplinarity at the Interfaces Between the Science Citation Index and the Social Science Citation Index

Intellectual structure of Library and Information Science in Iberoamerica using journal co-citation analysis: a comparative study based on Scopus and Web of Science

Evaluating the impact of interdisciplinary research: A multilayer network approach

Interactive overlays of journals and the measurement of interdisciplinarity on the basis of aggregated journal-journal citations

An Indicator of Research Front Activity: Measuring Intellectual Organization as Uncertainty Reduction in Document Sets

Scopus as a curated, high-quality bibliometric data source for academic research in quantitative science studies

Science overlay maps: A new tool for research policy and library management

Mapping the network structure of science parks: An exploratory study of cross-sectoral interactions reflected on the web

Exploring the geographies of academic social network sites from a socio-technical perspective

Output and citation impact of interdisciplinary networks: Experiences from a dedicated funding program

Interdisciplinarity in science: A tentative typology of disciplines and research areas

Tracking Areas Of Strategic Importance Using Scientometric Journal Mappings

Tracing “interdisciplinarity” using time series of journal maps: The visualization and dynamic animation of journal-journal citation relations

The Scientometric Measurement of Interdisciplinarity and Diversity in the Research Portfolios of Chinese Universities

Epistemic injustice and dissidence: A bibliometric analysis of the literature on Participatory Action Research hosted on the Web of Science

Various Methods for the Mapping of Science

“Interdisciplinarity” and “synergy” in the Œuvre of Judit Bar-Ilan

Exploring the Social Innovation Research Field Based on a Comprehensive Bibliometric Analysis