Abstract:This paper investigates how individual investor trading can cause stock prices to move for reasons unrelated to fundamentals. We use a sample of dual-listed stocks to identify the sources of their price movements. The results show that excess price comovement driven by the market-specific shock is persistent over the monthly horizon for some A-shares traded in China, but not for their H-shares traded in Hong Kong. Further trade-based analysis indicates that the market-specific shock to the A-shares' prices may be initiated by individual sentiment changes, as proxied by the buy-sell imbalance (BSI) of individual investors (except the wealthiest individuals), but the mechanism for its persistence must be an indirect one. We then hypothesize and confirm a feedback view that the sentiment-related feedback of sophisticated individuals can strengthen the persistence of sentiment-induced excess volatility. We find that the monthly correlation in daily BSI between two investor groups, the wealthiest individuals and all individuals, is positively related to the shock at the monthly frequency. Meanwhile, the BSI of the wealthiest individuals is negatively related to the shock’s magnitude, suggesting that their trading behavior cannot be explained by an unawareness of the documented excess comovement but can be explained as the risk averse behavior of sophisticated investors. Our evidence and interpretation suggest that individual investors are more than a simple carrier of noise trading, and they can contribute to market inefficiency not only through individual irrationality, but also through individual rationality. We use the feedback view to shed light on several cross-country empirical anomalies.

Why Investors Do Not Buy Cheaper Securities? an Analysis of Trading by Individual Investors in Chinese Stock Market," with Baolian Wang and Zhishu Wang

Why Investors Do Not Buy Cheaper Securities: Evidence from a Natural Experiment

Are Foreign Institutions More or Less Informed? Evidence from China's Stock Markets

The H-A Price Discount and Its Determinants

Are Domestic Investors Better Informed Than Foreign Investors?: Evidence from the Perfectly Segmented Market in China

Asset Pricing, Jump Risk, and China's B-share Discount Puzzle

Are Domestic Investors Better Informed than Foreign Investors? Evidence from the Perfectly Segmented Market in China

The Informativeness of Domestic and Foreign Investors’ Stock Trades: Evidence from the Perfectly Segmented Chinese Market

Information Asymmetry And Asset Prices: Evidence From The China Foreign Share Discount

A Resolution of the Chinese Discount Puzzle

Investor Sentiment, Idiosyncratic Risk, and Stock Price Premium: Evidence from Chinese Cross-Listed Companies

Evidence on the Foreign Share Discount Puzzle in China: Liquidity or Information Asymmetry?

Is attention-based stock buying profitable? Empirical evidence from Chinese individual investors

Do Investors Trade too Much? Evidence From China's Stock Markets

Whose money is smart? Individual and institutional investors’ trades based on analyst recommendations

Excess Comovement and Individual Investors: Direct Evidence from China's Bank Stocks

Size and ESG Premiums: Evidence from Chinese A-share Market

A (Partial) Resolution Of The Chinese Discount Puzzle The 2001 Deregulation Of The B-Share Market

Has Chinese Stock Market Become Efficient? Evidence From A New Approach

RETAIL INVESTORS’ BIASED BELIEFS ABOUT STOCKS THAT THEY HOLD: EVIDENCE FROM CHINA’S SPLIT SHARE STRUCTURE REFORM

The effect of market segmentation on stock prices: The China syndrome