Ultrafine particles and PM 2.5 in the air of cities around the world: Are they representative of each other?
Alma Lorelei de Jesus,Md Mahmudur Rahman,Mandana Mazaheri,Helen Thompson,Luke D Knibbs,Cheol Jeong,Greg Evans,Wei Nei,Aijun Ding,Liping Qiao,Li Li,Harri Portin,Jarkko V Niemi,Hilkka Timonen,Krista Luoma,Tuukka Petäjä,Markku Kulmala,Michal Kowalski,Annette Peters,Josef Cyrys,Luca Ferrero,Maurizio Manigrasso,Pasquale Avino,Giorgio Buonano,Cristina Reche,Xavier Querol,David Beddows,Roy M Harrison,Mohammad H Sowlat,Constantinos Sioutas,Lidia Morawska
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2019.05.021
IF: 11.8
2019-01-01
Environment International
Abstract:Can mitigating only particle mass, as the existing air quality measures do, ultimately lead to reduction in ultrafine particles (UFP)? The aim of this study was to provide a broader urban perspective on the relationship between UFP, measured in terms of particle number concentration (PNC) and PM2.5 (mass concentration of particles with aerodynamic diameter < 2.5 μm) and factors that influence their concentrations. Hourly average PNC and PM2.5 were acquired from 10 cities located in North America, Europe, Asia, and Australia over a 12-month period. A pairwise comparison of the mean difference and the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test with the application of bootstrapping were performed for each city. Diurnal and seasonal trends were obtained using a generalized additive model (GAM). The particle number to mass concentration ratios and the Pearson's correlation coefficient were calculated to elucidate the nature of the relationship between these two metrics.