ELECTRONIC VERSUS PAPER-BASED NURSING DOCUMENTATION SYSTEMS: THE CAREGIVERS WEIGH IN
Ping Yu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.2006.00904.x
2006-01-01
Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
Abstract:To the Editor: Information technology (IT) solutions have the potential to free caregivers in long-term care facilities from well-known problems with burdensome paper documentation, allow them more direct care time with clients, and improve the quality of nursing records. However, little scientific evidence is available to support this idea. In addition to the concern about return on investment, a big barrier to the slow uptake of IT solutions in long-term care1 is skepticism by managers about the capacity and willingness of older caregivers, most of them women, to use computers and the uncertainty about the potential change associated with introducing a new system.2 To my knowledge, no detailed study of caregivers' satisfaction with electronic documentation in nursing homes has been conducted. Research appears to be lacking on this important area that directly relates to the quality of life for an increasing number of older people who will live in nursing homes. The purpose of this research was to test the feasibility of implementing clinical IT solutions in nursing homes. A quasi-experimental, comparative design was undertaken in two homes belonging to the same management group: RSL Care in Queensland, Australia. The participants included 15 available staff in the home using the electronic system and 12 staff in the facility using paper documentation. The areas to be investigated included participants' basic demographic information, the norm about the usage of the relevant documentation system, participants' computer literacy and attitudes toward using IT solutions, their capacity to use the electronic or paper-based system, their satisfaction with such a system, and the information it provided. The research methods included semistructured interviews and a questionnaire survey based on the validated measurement scales (available from the author). No significant differences were found between the two facilities in terms of participants' sex (only one male participant at each site), age (range 20–60 in both sites), job roles, and aged care work experience (range 3 months to 40 years). The norm for using the relevant documentation system was positive. With regard to computer skills, no significant site difference was found for the 12 test items measuring IT skills required for the caregivers to use the clinical IT system in trial. The majority of the caregivers in both sites appeared to have adequate basic computer skills for adapting to its use. Five weeks after the IT system implementation, improvements in the three major problems of paper-based systems (time requirements, accessibility and legibility) were identified as the primary advantages of the electronic over the paper-based documentation. Except for these differences, responses to the other measurement items were similar between the two sites. Familiarity with the relevant documentation system was similar between the two sites as well. The respondents were equally happy with the majority of attributes of their nursing documentation system and the quality of the information provided by such a system, whether electronic or paper-based, although many caregivers at the electronic site reported the technical difficulties they experienced, including running speed and reliability issues. Several respondents acknowledged that the electronic documentation system enabled them to make more sense of what they read and thus enable them to give more precise care to their clients. Eleven weeks into the electronic documentation trial, 90% of caregivers (9/10) interviewed said that they did not need more training lessons but could use more practice with the electronic system. Only one caregiver expressed difficulty in using the electronic system because of a lack of basic keyboarding skills. This led her to avoid the task of documentation. For the majority of caregivers, the main challenge in nursing documentation appeared to be articulating what should be documented, rather than using electronic or paper-based documentation system. Eighty percent of caregivers (20/25) supported their organization's decision to implement clinical IT systems. These results suggest that caregivers are ready to go electronic. A short abstract was given at the 15th Annual Health Informatics Conference, New South Wales, on March 19, 2006, but the main content of the paper was not disclosed. Dr. Madeleine Strong Cincotta is acknowledged for her voluntary contribution to editing and proofreading the manuscript. Financial Disclosure: The author has no financial interest related to this work. This research was sponsored by RSL Care (http://www.rslcare.com.au). Author Contributions: The author is fully responsible for research design, acquisition of subjects and data, analysis and interpretation of data, and preparation of the letter. Sponsor's Role: The chief executive officer of RSL Care, Ross Smith, and members of the Project Steering Committee, Deborah Oxlade, Cheryl Richardson, Matthew Maw, Steve Powell, Susan DeVries, Susan Lane, and Michelle Coman, provided valuable input into the aim, planning, and conduct of the project, including the confinement of project scope and validation of the survey instruments. Cheryl Richardson, Leanne Miller, and Sue Beasley recruited the survey participants. However, the sponsor made no contribution to the design, methods, data collection, analysis, or preparation of the letter.