Sea Salt Emission, Transportation and Influence on Nitrate Simulation: a Case Study in Europe

Ying Chen,Yafang Cheng,Nan Ma,Ralf Wolke,Stephan Nordmann,Stephanie Schüttauf,Liang Ran,Birgit Wehner,Wolfram Birmili,Hugo A. C. Denier van der Gon,Qing Mu,Stefan Barthel,Gerald Spindler,Bastian Stieger,Konrad Müller,Guang-Jie Zheng,Ulrich Pöschl,Hang Su,Alfred Wiedensohler
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2016-309
2016-01-01
Abstract:Abstract. Sea salt aerosol (SSA) is one of the major components of primary aerosols and has significant impact on the formation of secondary inorganic aerosol particles on a global scale. In this study, the fully online coupled WRF-Chem model was utilized to evaluate the SSA emission scheme and its influence on the nitrate simulation in a case study in Europe during September 10–20, 2013. Meteorological conditions near the surface, wind pattern, and thermal stratification structure were well reproduced by the model. Nonetheless, coarse mode (PM1–10) particle mass concentration was substantially overestimated due to the overestimation of SSA and nitrate. Compared to filter measurements at 4 EMEP stations (coastal stations: Bilthoven, Kollumerwaard and Vredepeel; inland station: Melpitz), the modeled SSA concentrations were overestimated by a factor of 8–20. We found that the overestimation was mainly caused by the overestimated SSA emission over North Sea during September 16–20. Over the coastal regions, the SSA was injected into the continental free troposphere through an “aloft bridge” (about 500 to 1000 meter above the ground), a result of the different thermodynamic properties and planetary boundary layer (PBL) structure between continental and marine regions. The injected SSA was further transported inland and mixed downward to the surface through downdraft and PBL turbulence. This process broadened the influence of SSA to a larger downwind region, for example, leading to an overestimation of SSA at Melpitz, Germany by a factor of ~20. As a result, nitrate partitioning fraction (ratio between particulate nitrate and the summation of particulate nitrate and gas-phase nitric acid) increased by about 0.2 for the coarse mode nitrate due to the overestimation of SSA at Melpitz, but no significant difference in the partitioning fraction for the fine mode nitrate. About 140 % overestimation of the coarse mode nitrate was resulted from the influence of SSA at Melpitz. On the other hand, the overestimation of SSA inhibited the nitrate formation in the fine mode by about 20 %, because of the increased consumption of precursors by coarse mode nitrate formation.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?