Abstract:Abstract To monitor temporal variations of the Earth’s gravity field and mass transport in the Earth’s system, data from gravity recovery and climate experiment (GRACE) satellite mission and its successor GRACE Follow-On (GFO) are used. To fill in the temporal gap between these missions, other satellites’ kinematic orbits derived from GPS-based high-low satellite-to-satellite tracking data may be considered. However, it is well known that kinematic orbits are highly sensitive to various systematic errors. These errors are responsible for a non-stationary noise in the kinematic orbits, which is difficult to handle. As a result, the quality of the obtained gravity field solutions is reduced. In this research, we propose to apply an epoch-difference (ED) scheme in the context of the classical dynamic approach to gravity field recovery. Compared to the traditional undifferenced (UD) scheme, the ED scheme is able to mitigate constant or slowly varying systematic errors. To demonstrate the added value of the ED scheme, three sets of monthly gravity field solutions produced from 6 years of GRACE kinematic orbits are compared: two sets produced in-house (with the ED and UD scheme), and a set produced with the undifferenced scheme in the frame of the short-arc approach (Zehentner and Mayer-Gürr in J Geodesy 90(3):275–286, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-015-0872-7). As a reference, we use state-of-the-art ITSG-Grace2018 monthly gravity field solutions. A comparison in the spectral domain shows that the gravity field solutions suffer from a lower noise level when the ED scheme is applied, particularly at low-degree terms, with cumulative errors up to degree 20 being reduced by at least 20%. In the spatial domain, the ED scheme notably reduces noise levels in the mass anomalies recovered. In addition, the signals in terms of mean mass anomalies in selected regions become closer to those inferred from ITSG-Grace2018 solutions, while showing no evidence of any damping, when the ED scheme is used. We conclude that the proposed ED scheme is preferable for time-varying gravity field modeling, as compared to the traditional UD scheme. Our findings may facilitate, among others, bridging the gap between GRACE and GFO satellite mission.

Combination Service for Time-variable Gravity Fields (COST-G): Operations and New Developments

Comment on Hess-2022-168

Bridging the gap between GRACE and GRACE Follow-On by combining high–low satellite-to-satellite tracking data and satellite laser ranging

Improved GRACE‐FO Gravity Field Solution by Combining Different Accelerometer Transplant Products

The Temporal Improvement of Earth's Mass Transport Estimated by Coupling GRACE‐FO with a Chinese Polar Gravity Satellite Mission

GOCO06s – A satellite-only global gravity field model

Assessment of the Added Value of the GOCE GPS Data on the GRACE Monthly Gravity Field Solutions

AIUB-GRACE gravity field solutions for G3P: processing strategies and instrument parameterization

The celestial mechanics approach: application to data of the GRACE mission

Optimal Design of a Third Pair of Gravity Satellites to Augment Two Existing Polar Pairs to Enhance Earth's Temporal Gravity Field Recovery

Estimating coefficients for GRACE/GRACE-FO time-variable gravity field models using the GRACE-OBP approach

HUST-Grace2024: a new GRACE-only gravity field time series based on more than 20 years of satellite geodesy data and a hybrid processing chain

A hybrid approach for recovering high-resolution temporal gravity fields from satellite laser ranging

HUST-Grace2024: a new GRACE-only gravity field time series based on more than 20 years satellite geodesy data and a hybrid processing chain

Recovered GRACE time-variable gravity field based on dynamic approach with the non-linear corrections

A comparison of the gravity field over Central Europe from superconducting gravimeters, GRACE and global hydrological models, using EOF analysis

Improved recovery of temporal variations of the Earth’s gravity field from satellite kinematic orbits using an epoch-difference scheme

Benefit of enhanced electrostatic and optical accelerometry for future gravimetry missions

Reconstruction of GRACE Mass Change Time Series Using a Bayesian Framework

Contribution Analysis of GOCE SGG Observations at Different Orbital Altitudes to Tongji-GMMG2021S Gravity Field Model

A Regionally Refined and Mass‐Consistent Atmospheric and Hydrological De‐Aliasing Product for GRACE, GRACE‐FO and Future Gravity Missions