Contractual State or Livelihood Politics: Reflections on Kinship, Rites and Asymmetric Reciprocity Chinese Full Text

谭同学

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1004-2938.2023.03.005

2023-01-01

Abstract:The “social contract” among atomically isolated individuals and its “state of nature” assumption are the intellectual outgrowth of Christian civilization. They are deeply associated with expansive sovereignty, but devoid of a kinship perspective. If the idea of “kin” had been brought into the thinking about how “nature” was transformed into political sovereignty and civilized society, people who interacted on the the basis of “rites” would be regarded as an extension of the individual to the other, resulting in asymmetric reciprocity in relational increment. The concept of “living on” in traditional Chinese culture emphasizes that “living people” not only live, but live in symbiosis with nature. The idea that “you are in me and I am in you” is in line with the principle of reciprocity. Since modern times, the “living people” of the “living-on” civilization have been transformed into “nationals” and “people” who are in pursuit of self-reliant sovereignty. In the new era of integration of multiple civilizations, this idea of “livelihood politics” can become a theoretical fulcrum for the construction of independent knowledge systems in Chinese social sciences.