Abstract:Despite the controversial nature of the learning organization concept, few empirical studies have examined the relationship between the learning organization concept and firm performance. An exploratory study was conducted using the DLOQ along with objective measures of firm financial performance to assess this association. Findings suggest positive associations between the learning organization concept and firm performance. Introduction During the past several years, many scholars have suggested that learning may be the only source of sustainable competitive advantage and that the hallmark of effective organizations will become their capacity to learn (deGeus, 1988, 1997; Tsang, 1997). The concepts of ‘learning capability,’ ‘organizational learning,’ and the ‘learning organization’ have become the focus of considerable attention among adult educators, human resource developers, and managers. In particular, the notion of the learning organization has generated tremendous debate. Proponents of the learning organization concept suggest that it “may provide the catalyst which is needed to push forward, in an holistic way, the many strands, ideas, and values with which organizations must now concern themselves” (Jones & Hendry, 1992, p. 58). Jones and Hendry indicate that “there are signs that where an organization continuously transforms itself and provides a clear vision and mission, it will not only be competitive commercially, but will attract the best employees, be known for its exemplary human resource policies and practices, be concerned with developing all staff to their full potential, and be able to accommodate the tensions and changes such a policy will encourage, as people begin to learn and see things differently.” In contrast, some scholars have suggested that the learning organization concept is simply a “prescription to help managers retain control under dramatically changed external circumstances” (Coopey, 1995, p. 202; Fenwick, 1998). In spite of the multiple perspectives that exist about the learning organization, there is a pressing need to know “whether such ideas and practices genuinely create fitter and better organizations for both the people who work in them and the society they seek to serve” or whether this concept is “simply yet another ‘vision’ propounded by management and educational idealists or whether it is an ideal capable of reality” (Jones & Hendry, 1992, p. 58). To date, many of the contributions on the learning organization have been descriptive and prescriptive and the need for empirical research on this concept has been articulated by several scholars (Altman & Iles, 1997; Jacobs, 1995; Iles, 1994; Leitch, Harrison, Burgoyne & Blantern, 1996). Yet, there have been more thought papers on why learning matters than on the processes required to building learning organizations and their potential impact on firm performance. Despite the numerous accounts and suggestions that discuss why the learning organization concept presumably works, few concrete studies exist that clarify if and how it works to achieve performance improvement (Kaiser & Holton, 1998). Jacobs (1995) suggests that there are little data supporting the claim that performance improvement is directly related to the adoption of practices associated with the learning organization literature. Accordingly, one of the major research challenges is to establish the relationships between characteristics of the learning organization and organizational performance (Iles, 1994; Leitch, Harrison, Burgoyne, Blantern & 1996). Recent studies have begun to establish a research base that examines the dimensionality of the concept of the learning organization (Watkins, Yang & Marsick, 1997; Yang, Watkins & Marsick, 1998). However, if firms are to create learning organizations by focusing on the implementation of practices and processes that promote learning at the individual, team, and organizational levels, the linkages to improved organizational performance must be more firmly established. Therefore, the current research examines the relationship between the dimensions of the learning organization and financial performance utilizing both perceptual measures of firm performance and secondary financial data drawn from the COMPUSTAT and the Stern Stewart Performance 1000 financial databases. Assessing the relationship between the learning organization concept and objective measures of firm financial performance represents an empirical methodology that has not been employed to date. Theoretical Framework The theoretical grounding for this research is the Watkins and Marsick conceptualization of the learning organization (1993, 1996a, 1996b). For Watkins and Marsick, a learning organization is “one that learns continuously and transforms itself...Learning is a continuous, strategically used process – integrated with and running parallel to work” (1996b, p. 4). The foundation of the Watkins and Marsick perspective is based upon seven complementary action imperatives that they have identified that characterize organizations journeying toward this goal: (1) create continuous learning opportunities; (2) promote inquiry and dialogue; (3) encourage collaboration and team learning; (4) establish systems to capture and share learning; (5) empower people toward a collective vision; (6) connect the organization to its environment; and, (7) use leaders who model and support learning at the individual, team, and organizational levels. Their model emphasizes three key components – “(1) systemslevel, continuous learning; (2) that is created in order to create and manage knowledge outcomes; (3) which lead to improvement in the organization’s performance, and ultimately its value, as measured through both financial assets and non-financial i ntellectual capital” (Marsick & Watkins, 1999, pp. 10-11). Research Questions The following research questions guided this exploratory study: (1). What is the relationship between the seven dimensions of the DLOQ instrument and the perceptual organizational outcome variables as defined by financial and knowledge performance? (2). What is the relationship between the seven dimensions of the DLOQ instrument and objective organizational outcome variables as defined by four secondary measures of financial performance? [return on equity (ROE), return on assets (ROA), Tobin’s q, and market value-added (MVA)] Research Design This exploratory research study employed a mail survey methodology. The procedures used to design the sampling frame correspond to those outlined by Dillman (1978).

Is the Learning Organization for Real? Examining the Impacts of the Dimensions of the Learning Organization on Organizational Performance

Is the Learning Organization A Valid Concept in the Taiwanese Context?

The Construct of the Learning Organization: Dimensions, Measurement, and Validation

Making the Business Case for the Learning Organization Concept

Providing strategic leadership for learning: optimizing managerial coaching to build learning organizations

Learning Organization in Mainland China: Empirical Research on Its Application to Chinese State‐owned Enterprises

Impact of learning organization culture on performance in higher education institutions

Study of Learning Organization's Influence Upon Enterprise Performance

The Mechanism Used by Organizational Learning to Influence Organizational Performance

A Framework for Market-Based Organizational Learning: Linking Values, Knowledge, and Behavior

An Empirical Study on Learning Organization and Performance of Organization

An Empirical Study on the Construct and Effective Mechanism of Organizational Learning

Critical Aspects of Organizational Learning Research and Proposals for Its Measurement

Conceptualization and Evolution of Learning Organizations

An Empirical Study on the Structure of Organizational Learning and Organizational Performance

The Meaning and Measure of Organizational Learning Mechanisms in Secondary Schools

Research on the Relationship among Organization Character,Organizational Learning Capability and Organization Performance

The Dimensions Exploring of Performance View Embedded by Learning and Types of Organization Performance

Organizational Learning Processes and Outcomes: Major Findings and Future Research Directions

Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development guidelines for learning organization in higher education and its impact on lifelong learning – evidence from Indian business schools

Differentiation Strategy, Performance Measurement Systems and Organizational Performance: Evidence from Australia