Abstract:Due to a rapid economic growth over the past several decades China has significantly strengthened its international positions. This growth in its own turn was to a large extent due to a pragmatic and sound foreign strategy that the country has been pursuing since mid-1970s. However, in recent years both within and outside China there has been an on-going debate on the alleged radical transformation of the PRC’s perceptions of its national interests, its place in world politics, and its foreign policy. The variety of opinions becomes increasingly complicated as the number of discussants grows and new arguments are adduced in support of different positions. Whereas outside China this debate structures around the narrative of the Chinese assertiveness, within the country the main dispute is between the advocates of a traditional policy of ‘keeping a low profile’ (taoguang yanghui) and proponents of a new ‘striving for achievements’ (fenfa youwei) strategy. The present paper aims to provide a framework for a systematization of debates on the contemporary foreign policy of China in the English language academic literature based on two criteria: whether a researcher admits that the Chinese foreign policy is changing and how he assesses implications of these changes. Such an approach undoubtedly entails certain schematization of the presented views and arguments. However, it differs favorably from traditional, more narrative approaches to conceptualization of the debate since it establishes a clear, transparent theoretical framework aimed to identify the substantive core of the presented views. This, in turn, can bring about a better understanding of the current state and possible evolution of Chinese foreign policy in general. The author concludes that although these debates are far from being over, most researchers admit the PRC’s foreign policy strategy is undergoing a radical transformation. Since the latter half of 2000s there has been a steady trend in the foreign policy of China towards greater assertiveness. At the same time this transformation ensures continuity of the basic principles of Chinese diplomacy. All this means that further debates on the Chinese foreign policy should focus primarily on potential implications of this transformation for the PRC, the regional dynamics and international relations system as a whole.

Change and Continuity in Chinese Foreign Policy:China’s Engagement in the Libyan Civil War As a Case Study.

China Debates the Non-Interference Principle

That Is Not Intervention; That Is Interference with Chinese Characteristics: New Concepts, Distinctions and Approaches Developing in the Chinese Debate and Foreign and Security Policy Practice

Protecting China's Interests Overseas

The Logic of Contingency in China’s Insistence on the Non-interference Principle

The dynamics of China’s attitude towards implementing the responsibility to protect in the Middle East and North Africa

China’s Law Diplomacy——Theory and Practice

China's Conception of and Participation in the UN Peacekeeping Operation

China's Response to the Revolts in the Arab World: A Case of Pragmatic Diplomacy

Evolution of Public Diplomacy of Contemporary China

Debates on Changes in the Foreign Policy of Contemporary China (A Case Study of the English Language Academic Publications)

Chinese Foreign Relations Grand Strategies: From Mao Zedong to Xi Jinping

Corpus-based analysis of shifts in China's diplomatic stance across seven decades (1949-2018)

China’s New Foreign Policy under Xi Jinping

Creative Involvement:A Suggested Doctrine for China Based on the Reality of Sino-African Relations

China and the Responsibility to Protect

China’s Response to Threats to Its Overseas Economic Interests: Softening Non-Interference and Cultivating Hegemony

On China’s Modern Foreign Policy Through the Prism of the Concepts of “Dao” and “Shi”

Protection of Overseas Interests and Change of China's Foreign Policies

Domestic Politics, China's Rise, and the Future of the Liberal International Order

Domestic Politics, China’s Rise, and the Future of the Liberal International Order