Abstract:This dissertation studies the importance of firm-level price markup dynamics for business cycle fluctuations. In chapter one, I use recent IO techniques to measure the behavior of markups over the business cycle at the firm level. I find that markups are countercyclical with an average elasticity of -0.9 with respect to real GDP, in line with the earlier industrylevel evidence. Importantly, I find substantial heterogeneity in markup cyclicality across firms, with small firms having significantly more countercyclical markups than large firms. In chapter two, I examine if two prominent models in the literature are consistent with the empirical findings. First, I explore the Atkeson and Burstein (2008) model of oligopolistic competition. Coupled with an exogenous second-moment shock to firm productivities, this model results in a countercyclical average markup, but predicts that smaller firms reduce their markups in recessions. Second, I calibrate both Calvo and menu cost models of price stickiness to match the empirical heterogeneity in price durations as in Goldberg and Hellerstein (2011). I find that both models can match the average counter-cyclicality of markups in response to monetary shocks. Quantitatively, however, only the menu cost model, through its selection e↵ect, can match the extent of the empirical heterogeneity in markup cyclicality. In addition, both sticky price models imply pro-cyclical markup behavior in response to productivity shocks. In chapter three, I develop a new general equilibrium model that embeds customer capital into a standard firm dynamics model with entry and exit. A key feature of the model is that a firm’s decision about markups becomes dynamic – firms accumulate customer capital in the periods of fast growth by charging low markups, and choose to exploit it by charging high markups in the downturns. In particular, during recessions, the endogenous higher exit probability for smaller firms implies that they place lower weight on future profits, leading them to charge higher markups. This mechanism serves to endogenously increase the dispersion of firm sales and employment in recessions. Also, the resulting input misallocation iii amplifies both the volatility and persistence of the exogenous productivity shocks driving the business cycle.

Does Lumpy Investment Matter for Business Cycles?

A Q-Theory Model with Lumpy Investment

Lumpy Investment and Corporate Tax Policy

Habit Formation,Borrowing Constraints and the Real Business Cycle in China:An Empirical Study on a RBC Model

Expectations, beliefs and the business cycle: tracing back to the deep economic drivers

Putting the Cycle Back into Business Cycle Analysis

Investment Cycles

Investment timing and quantity under ambiguity and business cycles

Turbulent Business Cycles

Credit Constraints and Self-Fulfilling Business Cycles

The Investment Network, Sectoral Comovement, and the Changing U.S. Business Cycle

Inefficient Investment Waves

An Economical Business-Cycle Model

Cyclicality and Heterogeneity of Price Markup

Liquidity Premia, Price-Rent Dynamics, and Business Cycles

Indeterminacy, dynamic adjustment costs, and cycles

Idiosyncratic Investment Risk and Business Cycles

Ine¢ Cient Investment Waves

Stabilizing and destabilizing mechanisms: A new perspective to understand business cycles

Riskiness Choice and Endogenous Productivity Dispersion over the Business Cycle

Self-fulfilling Business Cycles with Production Networks