Evaluating local tumor destruction and wedge or segmental resection in the treatment of fibrolamellar hepatocellular carcinoma: An NCDB analysis.

Christopher Reese Bine,Marco Braaten,Alec Czaplicki,Eric G. Nielsen,Aron Lee,Peter T. Silberstein
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2024.42.3_suppl.512
IF: 45.3
2024-01-20
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Abstract:512 Background: Fibrolamellar hepatocellular carcinoma (FL-HCC) is a rare type of hepatic cancer, comprising 1% of all liver malignancies. Patients are often diagnosed in their second or third decade and often have a palpable liver mass. Treatment primarily consists of surgery and transplant, however, standardized protocols have not been well established due to its rarity. For patients who cannot receive a transplant, there are few studies examining and comparing other surgical types. Using the National Cancer Database, we aim to uncover survival and patient characteristic differences between those who receive Local Tumor Destruction vs Wedge or Segmental Resection. Methods: The National Cancer Database (NCDB) was used to identify patients diagnosed with FL-HCC from 2004 to 2019 using the histology codes 8171 as assigned by the Commission on Cancer Accreditation program. Kaplan-Meier, ANOVA Chi-Square, and Cox Proportional Hazards tests were performed. Data was analyzed using SPSS version 29 and statistical significance was set at α = 0.05. Results: Of the 803 patients in the sample,19 patients received Local Tumor Destruction (LTD) and 142 patients received Wedge or Segmental Resection (WSR). The average age of patients receiving LTD was 54 compared to 32 for WSR. WSR patients experienced longer overall survival than LTD (106 vs. 63 months respectively; p<0.05). When controlling for age, year of diagnosis, tumor size, comorbidity score, and surgery type, WSR showed a greater decrease in overall hazard compared to LTD (HR=0.224 vs 0.306; p<0.05). WSR use was highest in healthy patients with no co-morbidities, however, patients were also significantly more likely to have later stage tumors (II, III, and IV vs. stage I; p<0.001). Despite being associated with a lower OS, LTD was utilized more commonly for earlier stage (stage I vs. II, III and IV; p<0.001) and well differentiated tumors (p<0.001). Compared to WSR, it was associated with higher rates of therapy before and after surgery(p 0.05) between the treatment groups. Conclusions: Receipt of WSR is associated with improved survival compared to LTD. There are distinct demographic groups which may be guiding surgical selection. Further research into this disparity and other surgical types should be examined to create better guidelines for FL-HCC patients.
oncology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?