Abstract:From a global perspective,although the protection of freedom of expression will still be a problem in many countries,the new challenge of freedom of expression in the age of Internet is that people with ability and freedom to communicate freely tend to communicate only with people they agree with.This kind of ineffective communication leads to not only some negative consequences as "debates and communication cannot help people get close to the truth," but also to some serious negative ramifications as political division and social contradiction.In 2004,Ronald Dworkin delivered his concern in his writings on political division in American democracy.He also put forward his theoretical solution —"return to the common background." However,Dworkin's solution is more like an ideal one lack of practical strategy and workable operation.This article proposes a principle of "New Public Forum" and expects to solve the problem on a systematic,strategic and operational level.The principle of traditional public forum considers its main goal as solving the dilemma between the valuable role of mass media and the right of individuals to express freely and effectively.Today we have to deal with another dilemma because whereas the internet improves people's capability of sending and receiving information and expressing their opinions,the effectiveness of communication itself is still being threatened.Cyberkans,a phenomenon of worldwide network Balkanization,is the linchpin in this dilemma.Cyberkans results from complex factors such as political and legal policies,business strategies of Internet product manufacturers and a more crucial one that ordinary people as consumers tend to choose the internet product to help them filter for favorable information and opinions.In the Internet era,people not only rely on information filtration,but also prefer and actively choose filtering tools.They are fond of "personalized" products,which inevitably lead to information "cocoon" and "Daily Me." That is why people with different values,different preferences and different interests are easily separated and divided into different groups.Furthermore,opinions and beliefs in divided groups tend to become extreme in the process of "Group Polarization," which intensifies social contradictions and affects social stability because of the lack of effective debate and communication.Malfunction of the marketplace of opinions,group polarization and tagging tendency all manifest certain kind of ineffective communication resulting from Cyberkans. There are at least two solutions for these problems.The first one is to remove all separation institutes and integrate all information into one platform.This proposal fundamentally denies the network users' choices and overthrows market mechanism in the Network Economy,that's why it can only be applied to some web sites of government and other public service departments.The second solution is to establish a new kind of "Public Forum" for effective communication meanwhile keeping commodity market of internet working by itself.This new Public Forum Doctrine includes the test of extensity,compatibility and,the most important,efficiency.Extensity Test requires the forum to reach as many opinion groups as possible.Compatibility Test requires the forum to contain as many different opinions as possible.Efficiency Test requires political debaters to follow certain kind of regulations to make sure debates are reasonable and yield reasonable results.Considering the actual situation in China,the traditional mainstream media has the responsibility and capability to become the platform of the new public forum.

Resonance in the Same Frequency:The Infrastructure and Discourse Systemof Western Strategic Communication

The Discourse Power of The Target Language in External Communication

Cyberkans and Ineffectvie Communication:A New Public Forum Doctrine in the Internet Era

Russia’s Strategic Communication During the Ukraine Crisis (2013–2014): Victims, Hypocrites, and Radicals

Internet Communication and International Discursive Power Competition

U.S.-China Intercultural Dialogue in the Information-Psychological Warfare Paradigm: Linguistic Rhetoric Aspect

The Russia-Ukraine conflict as a discursive continuum: A comparative study of Business Today and New York Times using an extended corpus-based discourse-historical approach

INFORMATION WARFARE IN TERMS OF COMMUNICATION THEORY: ATTEMPTED ANALYSIS

The Communicative Transformation of the Image of Russia in the Us Media after the Annexation of Crimea

Analysis of Sino-Russian Media Cooperation and the Construction of International Online Public Opinion Discourse under the Dual Influence of Ecological and Online Environments

The geopolitical origins of Russian strategic culture and its enlightenment in China

Media analysis of the text on the example of Chinese strategy of information warfare

Influence of geopolitical and informational confrontations on Russian state policy

Impact of the Russian-Ukrainian Conflict on the International Situation in Russia

The State and Prospects of the Relations Between Russia and Western Countries Against the Background of the Ukrainian Crisis in the Focus of Chinese Socio-Political Expertise

International Communication: on the Significance of Borders in the Digital Borderless World

Shared Discourse Construction in the International Communication of Contemporary Chinese Values

Humanitarian Crisis of Civilization in the Context of Russian Aggression: Discursive-Cultural and Mental-Worldview Aspects

On China's Discourse Ability

Ukraine and the West in pro-Russia Chinese media: A methodology for the analysis of multimodal political narratives

Comparative Media Framing and Agenda Setting: Analyzing Chinese and U.S. Coverage of the Bucha Incident in the Russia-Ukraine War