Association of CD4 + Cell Count and HIV Viral Load with Risk of Non-Aids-defining Cancers.

Yunqing Ma,Jiajia Zhang,Xueying Yang,Shujie Chen,Sharon Weissman,Bankole Olatosi,Anthony Alberg,Xiaoming Li
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/qad.0000000000003637
IF: 4.632
2023-01-01
AIDS
Abstract:OBJECTIVES:HIV-induced immunodeficiency contributes to an increased risk of non-AIDS-defining cancers (NADC). This study aims to identify the most predictive viral load (VL) or CD4 + measures of NADC risk among people with HIV (PWH).DESIGN:Extracted from South Carolina electronic HIV reporting system, we studied adult PWH who were cancer-free at baseline and had at least 6 months of follow-up since HIV diagnosis between January 2005 and December 2020.METHODS:Using multiple proportional hazards models, risk of NADC was investigated in relation to 12 measures of VL and CD4 + cell count at three different time intervals before NADC diagnosis. The best VL/CD4 + predictor(s) and final model were determined using Akaike's information criterion.RESULTS:Among 10 413 eligible PWH, 449 (4.31%) developed at least one type of NADC. After adjusting for potential confounders, the best predictors of NADC were the proportion of days with viral suppression (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.47 (>25% and ≤50% vs. 0), 95% confidence interval [CI]: [0.28, 0.79]) and proportion of days with low CD4 + cell count (AIC = 7201.35) (HR: 12.28 (>75% vs. = 0), 95% CI: [9.29, 16.23]).CONCLUSIONS:VL and CD4 + measures are strongly associated with risk of NADC. In analyses examining three time windows, proportion of days with low CD4 + cell count was the best CD4 + predictor for each time window. However, the best VL predictor varied across time windows. Thus, using the best combination of VL and CD4 + measures for a specific time window should be considered when predicting NADC risk.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?