Abstract:It has been known to the public that high frequency of false and/or unnecessary alarms from patient monitoring devices causes "alarm fatigue" in critical care. But little is known about the impact to care on the less acute patients located outside the critical care areas, such as the traditional medical/surgical (med/surg) floor. Methods: As part of a larger population management study, we initiated continuous physiological monitoring to 79 beds of floor patients in a community hospital. In order to qualify the patient monitoring alarm load for subacute medical and surgical floor patients, we assessed alarm data from April 2009 to January 2010. A standard critical care monitoring system (Philips IntelliVue MP-5 and Telemetry) was installed and set to the default alarm limits. All waveform data available for the patient (typically ECG, RESP, PPG at 125hz 8 bit), all alarm conditions declared by the monitoring system, and 1 minute parameter trend data were saved to disk every 8 hours for all patients. A monitoring care protocol was created to determine whether the patient was monitored via the hardwired bedside or wirelessly via telemetry. Alarms were not announced on the care unit but instead notifications were the responsibility of remote telehealth center personnel. We retrospectively evaluated the frequency of alarms over specific physiologic thresholds (n= 4104 patients) and conducted adjudication of all alarms based on a smaller sampling (n=30 patients). Results: For all patients, the average hours of monitoring per patient were 16.5 hours with a standard deviation (s) of 8.3 hours and a median of 22 hours. The average number of alarms (all severities) per patient was 69.7 (s =90.3, median =28) alarms. When this is adjusted to the duration of monitoring, the average per patient, per day rate was 95.6 (s =124.2, median =34.2) alarms. The adjudicated sample (n=30 patients) resulted in 34% of critical alarms (lethal arrhythmias, extreme high or low heart rate [HR], extreme desaturation, apnea) being true and 63% of the high priority alarms (high or low HR, high or low RR, Low SpO(2), pause, Missed Beat, Pair PVCs, Pacer Not Pace, Non Sustain VT, Irregular HR, Multiform) being true. Analysis of alarm history resulted in the ability to reduce the HR alarm load by more than 50% with a simple limit adjustment of high HR from 120 to 130 bpm and a 36% or 65% reduction in SpO(2) alarm load by reducing the SpO(2) limit from 90% to 85% or 80% respectively. Conclusion: 1) Standard critical care alarm limits appear be too sensitive for subacute care areas of the hospital. 2) For most patients these alarm limits do not create a significant alarm load; however, for a small number of patients they cause a significant alarm load. 3) Alarm loads can be controlled with alarm limit settings appropriate to the population. 4) Current technology for HR and SpO(2) appear suitable for continuous monitoring of this population.

[Summary of Evidence for Threshold Setting of Multi-Parameter Electrocardiograph Monitor in Intensive Care Unit].

Review of Physiological Parameters Monitoring Technology in the ICU

Optimization Strategies To Reduce Alarm Fatigue In Patient Monitors

Evidence summary on the management of the developmentally supportive environment in the neonatal intensive care unit

Exploring Clinical Practices of Critical Alarm Settings in Intensive Care Units: A Retrospective Study of 60,000 Patient Stays from the MIMIC-IV Database

Update to Practice Standards for Electrocardiographic Monitoring in Hospital Settings: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association

Intensive care unit nurses' perceptions and practices regarding clinical alarms: A descriptive study

Performance comparison of 6 in-hospital patient monitoring systems in the detection and alarm of ventricular cardiac arrhythmias

Hospital-Based Electrocardiographic Monitoring: The Good, the Not So Good, and Untapped Potential

Implementing Practice Standards for Inpatient Electrocardiographic Monitoring

Call for Decision Support for ECG Alarm Administration among NICU Staff: Findings from a Large, Multicenter, Cross-Sectional Survey in China (Preprint)

Physiologic monitoring alarm load on medical/surgical floors of a community hospital

Changes in Default Alarm Settings and Standard In-Service are Insufficient to Improve Alarm Fatigue in an Intensive Care Unit: A Pilot Project

Using the Delphi method to establish nursing-sensitive quality indicators for ICU nursing in China.

[Expert consensus on neurophysiologic monitoring and evaluation of neurocritical care patients (2024 version)]

Summary of the best evidence of artificial airway endotracheal tube cuff management in ICU adult patients

Survival analysis of electroencephalogram monitoring patients in intensive care unit

Individual and Institutional Factors Affecting Cardiac Monitoring in Coronary Care Units: A National Survey of Chinese Nurses

Evidence summary for inter-hospital transport of critically ill children

Electrophysiologic monitoring in neurointensive care

The Survey of Bedside Equipment for Brain Function Monitoring in 28 PICUs in China