Abstract:Epileptic DisordersVolume 25, Issue 5 p. 779-782 CASE VIGNETTE Epileptogenicity of incomplete hippocampal inversion and hippocampal sclerosis in a case with periventricular nodular heterotopias Bingqing Li, Bingqing Li orcid.org/0000-0001-8558-5703 Department of Neurosurgery, The Affiliated Guangdong Second Provincial General Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou City, ChinaSearch for more papers by this authorYong Zhang, Yong Zhang Department of Neurosurgery, The Affiliated Guangdong Second Provincial General Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou City, ChinaSearch for more papers by this authorJingzhi Lin, Jingzhi Lin Department of Neurosurgery, The Affiliated Guangdong Second Provincial General Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou City, ChinaSearch for more papers by this authorLihui Xia, Lihui Xia Department of Neurosurgery, The Affiliated Guangdong Second Provincial General Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou City, ChinaSearch for more papers by this authorYang Zhang, Yang Zhang Department of Neurosurgery, The Affiliated Guangdong Second Provincial General Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou City, ChinaSearch for more papers by this authorYang Jin, Yang Jin Department of Neurosurgery, The Affiliated Guangdong Second Provincial General Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou City, ChinaSearch for more papers by this authorJin Fang, Jin Fang Department of Imaging, The Affiliated Guangdong Second Provincial General Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou City, ChinaSearch for more papers by this authorXiangshu Hu, Corresponding Author Xiangshu Hu [email protected] Department of Neurosurgery, The Affiliated Guangdong Second Provincial General Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou City, China Correspondence Xiangshu Hu, Department of Neurosurgery, The Affiliated Guangdong Second Provincial General Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou city, Guangdong Province 510317, China. Email: [email protected], Biao Han, No.322, School of Psychology, South China Normal University (Shipai), No.55 West Zhongshan Avenue, Tianhe District, Guangzhou City, Guangdong Province 510000, China. Email: [email protected]Search for more papers by this authorBiao Han, Corresponding Author Biao Han [email protected] School of Psychology, South China Normal University (Shipai), Guangzhou City, China Correspondence Xiangshu Hu, Department of Neurosurgery, The Affiliated Guangdong Second Provincial General Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou city, Guangdong Province 510317, China. Email: [email protected], Biao Han, No.322, School of Psychology, South China Normal University (Shipai), No.55 West Zhongshan Avenue, Tianhe District, Guangzhou City, Guangdong Province 510000, China. Email: [email protected]Search for more papers by this authorRuoyu Peng, Ruoyu Peng Department of Neurosurgery, The Affiliated Guangdong Second Provincial General Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou City, ChinaSearch for more papers by this author Bingqing Li, Bingqing Li orcid.org/0000-0001-8558-5703 Department of Neurosurgery, The Affiliated Guangdong Second Provincial General Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou City, ChinaSearch for more papers by this authorYong Zhang, Yong Zhang Department of Neurosurgery, The Affiliated Guangdong Second Provincial General Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou City, ChinaSearch for more papers by this authorJingzhi Lin, Jingzhi Lin Department of Neurosurgery, The Affiliated Guangdong Second Provincial General Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou City, ChinaSearch for more papers by this authorLihui Xia, Lihui Xia Department of Neurosurgery, The Affiliated Guangdong Second Provincial General Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou City, ChinaSearch for more papers by this authorYang Zhang, Yang Zhang Department of Neurosurgery, The Affiliated Guangdong Second Provincial General Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou City, ChinaSearch for more papers by this authorYang Jin, Yang Jin Department of Neurosurgery, The Affiliated Guangdong Second Provincial General Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou City, ChinaSearch for more papers by this authorJin Fang, Jin Fang Department of Imaging, The Affiliated Guangdong Second Provincial General Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou City, ChinaSearch for more papers by this authorXiangshu Hu, Corresponding Author Xiangshu Hu [email protected] Department of Neurosurgery, The Affiliated Guangdong Second Provincial General Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou City, China Correspondence Xiangshu Hu, Department of Neurosurgery, The Affiliated Guangdong Second Provincial General Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou city, Guangdong Province 510317, China. Email: [email protected], Biao Han, No.322, School of Psychology, South China Normal University (Shipai), No.55 West Zhongshan Avenue, Tianhe District, Guangzhou City, Guangdong Province 510000, China. Email: [email protected]Search for more papers by this authorBiao Han, Corresponding Author Biao Han [email protected] School of Psychology, South China Normal University (Shipai), Guangzhou City, China Correspondence Xiangshu Hu, Department of Neurosurgery, The Affiliated Guangdong Second Provincial General Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou city, Guangdong Province 510317, China. Email: [email protected], Biao Han, No.322, School of Psychology, South China Normal University (Shipai), No.55 West Zhongshan Avenue, Tianhe District, Guangzhou City, Guangdong Province 510000, China. Email: [email protected]Search for more papers by this authorRuoyu Peng, Ruoyu Peng Department of Neurosurgery, The Affiliated Guangdong Second Provincial General Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou City, ChinaSearch for more papers by this author First published: 20 June 2023 https://doi.org/10.1002/epd2.20088Read the full textAboutPDF ToolsExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onEmailFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditWechat Supporting Information Filename Description epd220088-sup-0001-Figures.docxWord 2007 document , 321.7 KB Figure S1.–S2. epd220088-sup-0002-Educational_Slides.pptxPowerPoint 2007 presentation , 2 MB Data S1. epd220088-sup-0003-Test_Yourself_Answers.docxWord 2007 document , 12.8 KB Data S2. Please note: The publisher is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article. REFERENCES 1Bartolomei F, Chauvel P, Wendling F. Epileptogenicity of brain structures in human temporal lobe epilepsy: a quantified study from intracerebral EEG. Brain. 2008; 131(Pt 7): 1818–30. 2Durica SR, Caruso JP, Podkorytova I, Ding K, Hays R, Lega B, et al. Stereo-EEG evaluation and surgical treatment in patients with drug-resistant focal epilepsy associated with nodular heterotopia. J Clin Neurophysiol. 2023; 40(1): 17–26. 3 Functional Neurosurgery Group, Neurosurgery branch of Chinese medical doctor association, Chinese anti-epileptic association, expert steering Committee of National Neurosurgery Surgical Robot Application Demonstration Project. Chinese expert consensus on radiofrequency thermocoagulation guided by stereotactic electroencephalogram in treatment of drug-refractory epilepsy. Chin J Med. 2021; 101(29): 2276–82. (in Chinese). 4Thom M. Review: hippocampal sclerosis in epilepsy: a neuropathology review. Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol. 2014; 40(5): 520–43. 5Mutti C, Riccò M, Bartolini Y, Bernabè G, Trippi I, Melpignano A, et al. Incomplete hippocampal inversion and epilepsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Epilepsia. 2021; 62(2): 383–96. 6Liu W, Yan B, An D, Xiao J, Hu F, Zhou D. Sporadic periventricular nodular heterotopia: classification, phenotype and correlation with filamin a mutations. Epilepsy Res. 2017; 133: 33–40. 7Davies KG, Bell BD, Hermann P. Hippocampal malformation as a cause of familial febrile convulsions and subsequent hippocampal sclerosis. Neurology. 1999; 52(8): 1717–8. 8Bratu FI, Oane I, Barborica A, Donos C, Pistol C, Daneasa A, et al. Network of autoscopic hallucinations elicited by intracerebral stimulations of periventricular nodular heterotopia: An SEEG study. Cortex. 2021; 145: 285–94. 9Mirandola L, Mai RF, Francione S, Pelliccia V, Gozzo F, Sartori I, et al. Stereo-EEG: diagnostic and therapeutic tool for periventricular nodular heterotopia epilepsies. Epilepsia. 2017; 58(11): 1962–71. Volume25, Issue5October 2023Pages 779-782 ReferencesRelatedInformation

Abstract:A common dual pathology observed on presurgical magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of epileptic patients is extrahippocampal lesions combined with mesial temporal sclerosis. The hippocampus was highly vulnerable to many types of insults. However, it is difficult to detect subtle hippocampal atrophy in some patients. The most reliable method to confirm epileptogenicity is chronic intracranial electroencephalography (EEG) monitoring. In this study, we recorded intracranial EEG signals in 11 patients with dual pathology. METHODS Patient enrollment We evaluated 11 patients with a confirmed diagnosis of dual pathology in Yuquan Hospital, China between 2007 and 2010. The patients were satisfied with the following criteria: (1) MRI showed structural lesions in the extrahippocampal lobe; (2) a postoperative follow-up period lasting at least 24 months. For all 11 patients, both seizure frequency and impact on quality of life were judged as severe enough to justify presurgical evaluation using implanted electrodes. Detailed histories of prenatal, neonatal, and early childhood events were systematically reviewed through direct interviews with the patients. Patients were initially evaluated with noninvasive methods, including scalp EEG monitoring to capture spontaneous seizures and MRI. MRI was performed using a 1.5 T scanner and included axial images parallel to the long axis of the hippocampus. Ipsilateral and contralateral hippocampal images were visually compared to confirm mesial temporal sclerosis (MTS). EEG recording and analysis Noninvasive data (scalp EEG and MRI) identified the mesial temporal region and a neocortical lesion site as the most likely ictal onset zones. Thus, all 11 patients were examined by implanted intracranial electrodes. To investigate the mesial temporal region, we used a stereo-eletroencephalography procedure. Depth electrodes were orthogonally directed through the middle temporal gyrus with the deepest contacts in the amygdala and anterior hippocampus. The number of neocortical electrodes implanted varied depending on the target region. Electrode positions were confirmed by post-implantation neuroimaging. Intracranial EEG was recorded at a sampling rate of 256 Hz to capture at least two spontaneous seizures. The seizures were classified by the site of origin of ictal discharges as follows: (1) discharge originating from neocortex and (2) discharge originating independently from hippocampus or amygdala. Subclinical seizures were defined as rhythmic discharges for 10 seconds or longer without subjective symptom or objective change. RESULTS Table 1 showed the clinical data of the 11 cases. Direct interviews with the parents were done in all patients. They could recall the clear histories. Severe head trauma was observed in three patients, one patient had the symptoms at the age of 5 years with fever and conscience impairment and was diagnosed as tuberculous meningitis, and one patient had a febrile convulsion at the age of 2 years. Six patients were considered normal before the initial seizure. MRI detected abnormalities in all patients; one patient revealed atrophy involving the entire cerebral hemisphere and the lesions were localized distributed at frontal or occipital area in six patients. Four patients had localized lesion on the lateral temporal cortex. All of these patients showed some degree of signal change on T2-weighted images, mostly hyperintensity. The mean age at seizure onset was 6.7 years (range 2-13) and at surgery was 17.9 years (range 9-37). For seizure symptoms, nine patients reported auras, seven evolved to complex partial seizures with automatisms, and two patients evolved to ipsilateral arm tonic or clonic. For patient 4, his seizure manifested as hypermotor seizure initially, then became generalized tonic-clonic seizure. In three patients, only the neocortical lesion was resected and the mesial temporal structures were spared. In eight patients, the neocortical lesion and mesial temporal structure were resected simultaneously; the extent of the neocortical lesion resection was determined based on the location and intracranial EEG findings. The mesial temporal structure resection included amygdala and approximately 3.5 cm anterior part of the hippocampus and parahippocampal gyrus. Histological examination revealed ulegyria accompanied by cortical dysplasia in three patients, focal cortical dysplasia in other four patients, and dysembryoplastic neuroepithelial tumor in four patients. Hippocampal neuron loss was seen in eight patients. The mean postoperative follow-up was 28.8 months (range 24-37). Ten patients were led to seizure freedom and Engle' II was found in one patient.Table 1: Preoperative clinical dataIntracranial EEG monitoring continued for a mean of 5.7 days; a total of 68 complex partial seizures and 16 secondarily generalized seizures were captured. Twenty subclinical seizures were also recorded. In 11 patients, many clinical seizures originating from the neocortical lesion were recorded; these clinical seizures constituted more than half of all seizures recorded. Apart from seizures originating from neocortex, 33 complex partial seizures (CPS) or 20 subclinical seizures (SCS) were also recorded independently from mesial temporal structures in these patients. Ictal discharges only originating from neocortical lesion surroundings were recorded in three patients. DISCUSSION The success of epilepsy surgery is judged by cessation of seizure activity, which depends on the removal of tissue that is responsible for epileptogenesis. In the present study, we used intracranially recorded EEG in epilepsy patients suffering from dual pathology to determine the epileptogenic region. Our cases showed that more than half of clinical seizures arise from the region in the vicinity of the extrahippocampal lesion; this result supported the view that the seizure onset zone often existed in the cortex surrounding the structural damage. This is based on the assumption that epileptogenicity tends to be formed in the vicinity of the lesion in epileptic patient with localized structural lesions.1 Several mechanisms have been suggested for the susceptibility of epileptogenicity formation in the vicinity of structural lesions, including local neuronal injury, glial proliferation, vascular changes, and neurotransmitter changes. In addition, the presence of intrinsic epileptogenicity in dysplastic cortex has been suggested. Previous studies addressed the problem of the most efficacious surgical approach for patients with dual pathology. Cascino et al2 reported on three patients who exhibited seizure control only after a second operation in which the atrophic hippocampal was removed. Since the resected regions of the reoperations contained the hippocampus, epileptogenicity of the hippocampus attracted attention. To confirm epileptogenicity of the hippocampus, a direct method is to record ictal discharges in intracranial EEG. In our patients, a total of 33 clinical seizures and 20 subclinical seizures originated independently from hippocampus; all seizures only originated from hippocampus in three patients. These findings supported the presence of epileptogenicity in the mesial temporal structures independent of the epileptogenicity in the vicinity of the neocortical lesion. Reports from Mathern et al3 also found 11 patients had ictal discharges from the mesial structure among 16 patients with structural lesions. The pathogenesis of this dual pathology is still unclear. One possibility is that extrahippocampal lesions produce seizures that, if uncontrolled, gradually induce MTS and temporal lobe epilepsy. Indeed, animal studies showed that repetitive stimulation of inputs to the hippocampus produces a pathology resembling temporal sclerosis.4 However, several studies found that the degree of hippocampal atrophy was not related to the duration or severity of seizures. This suggested that a common pathogenic mechanism may cause concomitant hippocampal sclerosis and extrahippocampal lesions in these patients and repetitive neocortical seizures may have only a minor role in the progression of hippocampal damage. In some cases, seizures were initially tonic-clonic, but slowly transformed to complex partial seizures involving the mesial temporal area. This indicated that sclerosis of the mesial temporal region may require several years after the initial brain insult. Li et al5 compared the results between lesionectomy, resection of the atrophic hippocampus, and the combination of both procedures in patients with diverse pathologies. Although the sample was small, this study suggested that the combination of the two procedures offered the best seizure control. The same authors expanded the number of patients in a second report and confirmed their first results; they concluded that resection of both lesions should be considered whenever possible. Identification of hippocampal sclerosis in patients with neocortical epilepsies is important for optimal surgical treatment and for prognosis of postoperative seizure outcome. Because of the small sample in this study, further studies are required to investigate the intracranial EEG in epileptic patients with dual pathology.

Epileptogenicity of Incomplete Hippocampal Inversion and Hippocampal Sclerosis in a Case with Periventricular Nodular Heterotopias.

Seizure Outcome And Its Prognostic Predictors After Hemispherotomy In Children With Refractory Epilepsy In A Chinese Pediatric Epileptic Center

Lesional Intractable Epileptic Spasms in Children: Electroclinical Localization and Postoperative Outcomes

Subtotal Hemispherotomy for Intractable Lesional Hemispheric Epilepsy Without Hemiparesis in Children

Neuropathological Findings in Intractable Epilepsy: 435 Chinese Cases

Structural brain abnormalities in the common epilepsies assessed in a worldwide ENIGMA study

Seizure‐associated Hippocampal Volume Loss: A Longitudinal Magnetic Resonance Study of Temporal Lobe Epilepsy

Epileptic Network Surgery: From Network Basis to Clinical Practice

Hemispheric Surgery Outcome Prediction Scale: Development and Validation of a Seizure Freedom Prediction Tool

Postoperative Seizure Outcomes and Antiseizure Medication Utilization Based on Histopathological Diagnosis: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Complementary structural and functional abnormalities to localise epileptogenic tissue

Intracranial Electroencephalography Study in Epileptic Patients with Dual Pathology.

Predictors of Outcome in the Surgical Treatment for Epilepsy.

Artificial intelligence and MRI: the source of a new epilepsy taxonomy

Histopathological Findings in Brain Tissue Obtained during Epilepsy Surgery

Out of Sight, Not Yet Out of Reach: Surgical Outcomes in MRI-Negative and Pathology-Negative Epilepsy Patients

[Clinical and pathological definition of temporal medium epilepsy subtypes with hypocampic sclerosis]

Resective Epilepsy Surgery and Respective Histopathological Diagnoses: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Searching for a paradigm shift in the research on the epilepsies and associated neuropsychiatric comorbidities. From ancient historical knowledge to the challenge of contemporary systems complexity and emergent functions

Patterns of subregional cerebellar atrophy across epilepsy syndromes: An ENIGMA‐Epilepsy study

Multimodal approach in the pre-surgical evaluation of focal epilepsy surgery candidates: how far are we from a non-invasive ESI-based "sourcectomy"?