Effect of Total SMS Activity on LDL Catabolism in Mice.

Zhiqiang Li,Mulin He,Guangzhi Chen,Tade Souaiaia,Tilla S. Worgall,Xian-Cheng Jiang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1161/atvbaha.123.319031
2023-01-01
Arteriosclerosis Thrombosis and Vascular Biology
Abstract:BACKGROUND:Sphingomyelin (SM) and cholesterol are 2 key lipid partners on cell membranes and on lipoproteins. Many studies have indicated the influence of cholesterol on SM metabolism. This study examined the influence of SM biosynthesis on cholesterol metabolism. METHODS:Inducible global Sms1 KO (knockout)/global Sms2 KO mice were prepared to evaluate the effect of whole-body SM biosynthesis deficiency on lipoprotein metabolism. Tissue cholesterol, SM, ceramide, and glucosylceramide levels were measured. Triglyceride production rate and LDL (low-density lipoprotein) catabolism were measured. Lipid rafts were isolated and LDL receptor mass and function were evaluated. Also, the effects of exogenous sphingolipids on hepatocytes were investigated. RESULTS:We found that total SMS (SM synthase) depletion significantly reduced plasma SM levels. Also, the total deficiency significantly induced plasma cholesterol, apoB (apolipoprotein B), and apoE (apolipoprotein E) levels. Importantly, total SMS deficiency, but not SMS2 deficiency, dramatically decreased LDL receptors in the liver and attenuated LDL uptake through the receptor. Further, we found that total SMS deficiency greatly reduced LDL receptors in the lipid rafts, which contained significantly lower SM and significantly higher glucosylceramide, as well as cholesterol. Furthermore, we treated primary hepatocytes and Huh7 cells (a human hepatoma cell line) with SM, ceramide, or glucosylceramide, and we found that only SM could upregulate LDL receptor levels in a dose-dependent fashion. CONCLUSIONS:Whole-body SM biosynthesis plays an important role in LDL cholesterol catabolism. The total SMS deficiency, but not SMS2 deficiency, reduces LDL uptake and causes LDL cholesterol accumulation in the circulation. Given the fact that serum SM level is a risk factor for cardiovascular diseases, inhibiting SMS2 but not SMS1 should be the desirable approach.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?