Interculturality, performance and everyday life

A. Jenkinson
2011-10-01
Abstract:The conventional view of interculturalism often refers to an event, or space, or ways of working, but not directly to people. Interculturalism has come to denote a construct, an application that may be spatially and temporally limited. One of the reasons for such a conventional view of interculturalism is that it is overshadowed by its suffix -ism. The tendency to apply interculturalism when and if required is true for all disciplines, not just Performing Arts. The -isms are useful Western expressions that help to categorise and analyse differing perspectives; as such, this article is not a categorical dismissal of -isms in general. In the specific case of interculturalism, the -ism annihilates the dynamic value of the prefix inter-. Inter- draws the attention to the personal, thus to the interpersonal, which is the reason why I argue for emphasising the prefix and not the suffix. My contention is that, in the context of globalization - which I consider to be global inter dependency - it is vital to understand the variety of relationships between our 'selves', and 'others', and to acknowledge the interculturality of people is a step in that direction. On a macro level, global interdependency is out reality on a micro level , if we 'depend on the kindness of stranger's, it is time that we attempted to understand the potentiality of our relationships with these so-called 'stranger's, in terms of the presence of the self in the other and the other in the self.
Art,Sociology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?