(1015) No Signs of Recovery: Durable LVAD Implantation for Cardiac Graft Dysfunction

L. Pi,V. Jayachandiran,S. De,S. Smith,R. Davey
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healun.2023.02.1226
IF: 13.569
2023-01-01
The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation
Abstract:Introduction Graft dysfunction following cardiac transplantation is treated aggressively regardless of etiology; however, graft dysfunction requiring durable LVAD implantation has rarely been described. We present a case of cardiac transplantation complicated by late graft dysfunction requiring durable LVAD implantation. Case Report A 52 year-old woman presented to hospital in cardiogenic shock (CS) with refractory ventricular arrhythmias (VAs). LVEF was 20% with global hypokinesis. Coronary angiogram revealed mild coronary artery disease, and endomyocardial biopsy (EMB) diagnosed giant cell myocarditis. Due to worsening CS and VAs despite escalating inotropic support and IABP insertion, she underwent temporary LVAD implantation as a bridge to decision, then cardiac transplantation 2 months later due to lack of recovery of cardiac function. Her post-transplant course was complicated by progressive graft dysfunction with LVEF deteriorating from >70% two weeks post-transplant, to 15-20% 8 months post-transplant (Table 1). CT thorax revealed no coronary artery calcification to implicate severe cardiac allograft vasculopathy. EMBs demonstrated ISHLT Grade 2R rejection treated with methylprednisolone and thymoglobulin. Donor-specific antibodies (DSAs) increased to 9,837 MFI 7 months post-transplant despite EMB showing antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) Grade 0. She was diagnosed with presumed AMR causing late graft dysfunction, and treated with thymoglobulin, plasmapheresis/IVIg, then bortezomib, with reduction in DSAs but no improvement in cardiac function. Her invasive hemodynamics remained consistent with CS. Immediate re-transplantation was considered immunologically high risk, thus she underwent durable LVAD implantation 14 months post-transplant, as a bridge to potential re-transplantation. Summary This case report highlights the importance of aggressive intervention for cardiac allograft rejection, and presents an uncommon course of treatment for severe late graft dysfunction.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?