Abstract:Divergence time estimation-the calibration of a phylogeny to geological time-is an integral first step in modeling the tempo of biological evolution (traits and lineages). However, despite increasingly sophisticated methods to infer divergence times from molecular genetic sequences, the estimated age of many nodes across the tree of life contrast significantly and consistently with timeframes conveyed by the fossil record. This is perhaps best exemplified by crown angiosperms, where molecular clock (Triassic) estimates predate the oldest (Early Cretaceous) undisputed angiosperm fossils by tens of millions of years or more. While the incompleteness of the fossil record is a common concern, issues of data limitation and model inadequacy are viable (if underexplored) alternative explanations. In this vein, Beaulieu et al. (2015) convincingly demonstrated how methods of divergence time inference can be misled by both (i) extreme state-dependent molecular substitution rate heterogeneity and (ii) biased sampling of representative major lineages. These results demonstrate the impact of (potentially common) model violations. Here, we suggest another potential challenge: that the configuration of the statistical inference problem (i.e., the parameters, their relationships, and associated priors) alone may preclude the reconstruction of the paleontological timeframe for the crown age of angiosperms. We demonstrate, through sampling from the joint prior (formed by combining the tree (diversification) prior with the calibration densities specified for fossil-calibrated nodes) that with no data present at all, that an Early Cretaceous crown angiosperms is rejected (i.e., has essentially zero probability). More worrisome, however, is that for the 24 nodes calibrated by fossils, almost all have indistinguishable marginal prior and posterior age distributions when employing routine lognormal fossil calibration priors. These results indicate that there is inadequate information in the data to over-rule the joint prior. Given that these calibrated nodes are strategically placed in disparate regions of the tree, they act to anchor the tree scaffold, and so the posterior inference for the tree as a whole is largely determined by the pseudodata present in the (often arbitrary) calibration densities. We recommend, as for any Bayesian analysis, that marginal prior and posterior distributions be carefully compared to determine whether signal is coming from the data or prior belief, especially for parameters of direct interest. This recommendation is not novel. However, given how rarely such checks are carried out in evolutionary biology, it bears repeating. Our results demonstrate the fundamental importance of prior/posterior comparisons in any Bayesian analysis, and we hope that they further encourage both researchers and journals to consistently adopt this crucial step as standard practice. Finally, we note that the results presented here do not refute the biological modeling concerns identified by Beaulieu et al. (2015). Both sets of issues remain apposite to the goals of accurate divergence time estimation, and only by considering them in tandem can we move forward more confidently.

Author Correction: Evolutionary History Resolves Global Organization of Root Functional Traits

Author Correction: Liriodendron Genome Sheds Light on Angiosperm Phylogeny and Species–pair Differentiation

Correction To: Alternative Splicing of a Barley Gene Results in an Excess‑tillering and Semi‑dwarf Mutant

Corrigendum: Species Identification of Dracaena Using the Complete Chloroplast Genome as a Super-Barcode

Author Correction: Multitrophic arthropod diversity mediates tree diversity effects on primary productivity

Author Correction: Chromosome-level genomes of three key Allium crops and their trait evolution

Author Correction: The Apostasia genome and the evolution of orchids

Correction: Corrigendum: Autophagy-associated alpha-arrestin signaling is required for conidiogenous cell development in Magnaporthe oryzae

Correction: Constitutive expression of an A-5 subgroup member in the DREB transcription factor subfamily from Ammopiptanthus mongolicus enhanced abiotic stress tolerance and anthocyanin accumulation in transgenic Arabidopsis

Author Correction: The reference genome of Miscanthus floridulus illuminates the evolution of Saccharinae

Author Correction: Nonlinearity of Root Trait Relationships and the Root Economics Spectrum

Correction to: An integrative phylogenomic approach to elucidate the evolutionary history and divergence times of Neuropterida (Insecta: Holometabola)

Corrigendum: Phylogeny and Taxonomy on Cryptic Species of Forked Ferns of Asia

Publisher Correction: The reference genome of Miscanthus floridulus illuminates the evolution of Saccharinae

Erratum: Functional Metagenomic Profiling of Nine Biomes

Erratum: Publisher Correction: Removal of the C4-domain preserves the drought tolerance enhanced by CsMYB4a and eliminates the negative impact of this transcription factor on plant growth

Erratum: Genomic insights into salt adaptation in a desert poplar

Erratum to: Genome-wide association studies reveal the coordinated regulatory networks underlying photosynthesis and wood formation in Populus

Corrigendum: The Sordariomycetes: an expanding resource with Big Data for mining in evolutionary genomics and transcriptomics

Correction for Pasari Et Al., Several Scales of Biodiversity Affect Ecosystem Multifunctionality

The Past Sure is Tense: On Interpreting Phylogenetic Divergence Time Estimates