Abstract:Background: Default nudges are an increasingly prominent tool for promoting healthy and sustainable food choices; however, questions of acceptance remain. While default nudges are more acceptable to the public than traditionally paternalistic tools that aim to restrict choice, they are also the least acceptable amongst nudging strategies. Little research has investigated the aspects of default nudge design that can be leveraged to better uphold freedom of choice, increase public acceptance, and therefore heighten legitimacy of default nudges. Consequently, this study examines public acceptance of five food choice default nudges with demonstrated precedent of effectiveness, as drawn from research studies and/or real-world policies, along with a design variation of each anticipated to increase acceptance. Three drivers of acceptance - perceived intrusiveness, perceived effectiveness, and own behavior - are examined. Methods: An online survey was administered in Germany (N = 451) to a sample representative of the adult population on quotas of age, gender and income. Acceptance and drivers were measured using seven-point Likert scales. Significant differences in median acceptance of the nudge were determined and displayed graphically. Ten proportional odds ordered logit models were applied and estimated using a maximum likelihood approach to investigate the mechanisms of nudge acceptance. Results: Examined changes in nudge design, particularly decreasing costliness of opting out and increasing transparency, increased the acceptance of three of the five nudges (N2.2: p = 0.000; N3.2: p = 0.000; N4.2: p = 0.008). Perceived intrusiveness emerged as the most prominent driver of acceptance (negative relationship), followed by perceived effectiveness (positive relationship). Own engagement in the target behavior of the nudge and socio-demographic variables demonstrated negligible impact on acceptance. Conclusions: Mitigating the costliness of opting out and improving nudge transparency emerge as key opportunities for choice architects to improve public acceptance, and thereby potentially identify 'sweet spots' in designing default nudges that are both effective and acceptable. The protection of individual freedom of choice and effectiveness are key aspects for choice architects to communicate to increase acceptance.

A meta-analysis on the effectiveness of food-waste reducing nudges

A meta-analytical review of intervention experiments to reduce food waste

The nudge strategies for weight loss in adults with obesity and overweight: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Nudging interventions on sustainable food consumption: a systematic review

Efficacy of informational intervention on food waste: Evidence from a randomized controlled trial

A systematic review of school meal nudge interventions to improve youth food behaviors

What shapes food waste behaviors? New insights from a comprehensive action determination model

Overcoming barriers to sustainable development: Evaluating what information frameworks matter and how they work in reducing consumer food waste

Understanding Consumers’ Food Waste Reduction Behavior—A Study Based on Extended Norm Activation Theory

Direct and Spillover Effects of Social Norm Nudges for Household Recycling: A Longitudinal Field Experiment

A Systematic Review of Pre-Post Studies Testing Behaviour Change Interventions to Reduce Consumer Food Waste in the Household

Nudging in Public Health Lifestyle Interventions: A Systematic Literature Review and Metasynthesis

Eco-compensation Quantification of Sustainable Food Waste Management Alternatives Based on Economic and Environmental Life Cycle Cost-Benefit Assessment

Using Behavioural Insights to Promote Food Waste Recycling in Urban Households—Evidence From a Longitudinal Field Experiment

Effectiveness and context dependency of social norm interventions: five field experiments on nudging pro-environmental and pro-social behavior

How to Effectively Encourage Sustainable Food Choices: A Mini-Review of Available Evidence

Public acceptance of default nudges to promote healthy and sustainable food choices

Does the Nudge Effect Persist? Evidence from a Field Experiment Using Social Comparison Message in China

From Attitude to Behavior: The Effect of Residents' Food Waste Attitudes on Their Food Waste Behaviors in Shanghai

Analysis of factors influencing college students' food waste behavior and evaluation of labor education intervention

The specially designed nudging tableware promotes healthy food choices: evidence from a randomized crossover trial in normal-weight young adults.