Diagnostic Efficacy and Therapeutic Decision-making Capacity of an Artificial Intelligence Platform for Childhood Cataracts in Eye Clinics: A Multicentre Randomized Controlled Trial
Haotian Lin,Ruiyang Li,Zhenzhen Liu,Jingjing Chen,Yahan Yang,Hui Chen,Zhuoling Lin,Weiyi Lai,Erping Long,Xiaohang Wu,Duoru Lin,Yi Zhu,Chuan Chen,Dongxuan Wu,Tongyong Yu,Qianzhong Cao,Xiaoyan Li,Jing Li,Wangting Li,Jinghui Wang,Mingmin Yang,Huiling Hu,Li Zhang,Yang Yu,Xuelan Chen,Jianmin Hu,Ke Zhu,Shuhong Jiang,Yalin Huang,Gang Tan,Jialing Huang,Xiaoming Lin,Xinyu Zhang,Lixia Luo,Yuhua Liu,Xialin Liu,Bing Cheng,Danying Zheng,Mingxing Wu,Weirong Chen,Yizhi Liu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2019.03.001
IF: 15.1
2019-01-01
EClinicalMedicine
Abstract:Background: CC-Cruiser is an artificial intelligence (AI) platform developed for diagnosing childhood cataracts and providing risk stratification and treatment recommendations. The high accuracy of CC-Cruiser was previously validated using specific datasets. The objective of this study was to compare the diagnostic efficacy and treatment decision-making capacity between CC-Cruiser and ophthalmologists in real-world clinical settings. Methods: This multicentre randomized controlled trial was performed in five ophthalmic clinics in different areas across China. Pediatric patients (aged <= 14 years) without a definitive diagnosis of cataracts or history of previous eye surgery were randomized (1:1) to receive a diagnosis and treatment recommendation from either CC-Cruiser or senior consultants (with over 5 years of clinical experience in pediatric ophthalmology). The experts who provided a gold standard diagnosis, and the investigators who performed slit-lamp photography and data analysis were blinded to the group assignments. The primary outcome was the diagnostic performance for childhood cataracts with reference to cataract experts' standards. The secondary outcomes included the evaluation of disease severity and treatment determination, the time required for the diagnosis, and patient satisfaction, which was determined by the mean rating. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03240848). Findings: Between August 9, 2017 and May 25, 2018, 350 participants (700 eyes) were randomly assigned for diagnosis by CC-Cruiser (350 eyes) or senior consultants (350 eyes). The accuracies of cataract diagnosis and treatment determination were 87.4% and 70.8%, respectively, for CC-Cruiser, which were significantly lower than 99.1% and 96.7%, respectively, for senior consultants (p < 0.001, OR = 0.06 [95% CI 0.02 to 0.19]; and p < 0.001, OR = 0.08 [95% CI 0.03 to 0.25], respectively). The mean time for receiving a diagnosis from CC-Cruiser was 2.79 min, which was significantly less than 8.53 min for senior consultants (p < 0.001, mean difference 5.74 [95% CI 5.43 to 6.05]). The patients were satisfied with the overall medical service quality provided by CC-Cruiser, typically with its time-saving feature in cataract diagnosis. Interpretation: CC-Cruiser exhibited less accurate performance comparing to senior consultants in diagnosing childhood cataracts and making treatment decisions. However, the medical service provided by CC-Cruiser was less time-consuming and achieved a high level of patient satisfaction. CC-Cruiser has the capacity to assist human doctors in clinical practice in its current state. (C) 2019 Published by Elsevier Ltd.