Abstract:Abstract. With the focus of climate policy shifting from pledges to implementation, there is an increasing need to track progress on climate change mitigation at country level, especially for the land-use sector. Despite new tools and models offering unprecedented monitoring opportunities, striking differences remain in estimations of anthropogenic land-use CO2 fluxes between the national greenhouse gas inventories (NGHGIs) used to assess compliance with the Paris Agreement, and the Global Carbon Budget and IPCC assessment reports, both based on global bookkeeping models (BMs). Recent evidence showed that these differences are mainly due to inconsistent definitions of anthropogenic forest CO2 fluxes. In particular, the part of the land sink that is caused by the indirect effects of human-induced environmental change (e.g., fertilization effect on vegetation growth due to increase atmospheric CO2 concentration, climate change) on managed lands is treated as non-anthropogenic by BMs, while in most cases is considered anthropogenic in NGHGIs. In addition, countries use a broader definition of managed land than BMs. Building on previous studies, we implement an approach that adds the CO2 sink due to environmental change from countries’ managed forest area (estimated by Dynamic Global Vegetation Models, DGVMs) to the original land-use flux from BMs. This sum is expected to be conceptually more comparable to NGHGIs. Our analysis uses updated and more comprehensive data from NGHGIs than previous studies and provides model results at a greater level of disaggregation in terms of land categories (i.e., forest land, deforestation, organic soils, other land uses) and countries. Our results confirm a large difference in land use CO2 fluxes between the ensemble mean of the BMs, estimating a source of 4.3 GtCO2 yr-1 globally for the period 2001–2020, and NGHGIs, which estimate a sink of -1.7 GtCO2 yr-1. Most of this 6.0 GtCO2 yr-1 gap is found on forest land (3.8 GtCO2 yr-1), with differences also for deforestation (1.1 GtCO2 yr-1), other land uses (1.0 GtCO2 yr-1), and to a lesser extent for organic soils (0.1 GtCO2 yr-1). By adding the DGVM ensemble mean sink arising from environmental change in managed forests (-5.1 GtCO2 yr-1) to BMs estimates, the gap between BMs and NGHGIs becomes significantly smaller both globally (residual gap: 0.9 GtCO2 yr-1) and in most regions and countries. The remaining differences mostly reflect smaller net emissions from deforestation and agricultural land in the NGHGIs of developing countries than in the BMs. By reconciling most of the differences between NGHGIs and global models (BMs and DGVMs), offering a blueprint for operationalizing future comparisons, and identifying areas to be further investigated, this study represents an important step forward for increasing transparency and confidence in land-use CO2 flux estimates at the country level. This is crucial to support land-based mitigation investments and assess the countries’ collective progress under the Paris Agreement’s Global Stocktake.

Forest structure and vegetation dynamics as a driver of global carbon uptake

Spatial heterogeneity of global forest aboveground carbon stocks and fluxes constrained by spaceborne lidar data and mechanistic modeling

Variations of Carbon Allocation and Turnover Time Across Tropical Forests

Transient and Lagged Effects of Vegetation Dynamics&#160;on the Global CO2 Growth Rate

Carbon Benefits from Forest Transitions Promoting Biomass Expansions and Thickening

The global potential for increased storage of carbon on land

Importance of Vegetation Dynamics for Future Terrestrial Carbon Cycling

How Well Do We Understand the Land‐Ocean‐Atmosphere Carbon Cycle?

The enduring world forest carbon sink

A Large and Persistent Carbon Sink in the World’s Forests

Role of forest regrowth in global carbon sink dynamics

Recent Trends and Drivers of Regional Sources and Sinks of Carbon Dioxide

Atmospheric deposition, CO 2 , and change in the land carbon sink

Uncertainty in the response of terrestrial carbon sink to environmental drivers undermines carbon-climate feedback predictions.

Contribution of semi-arid ecosystems to interannual variability of the global carbon cycle

Transient Dynamics of Terrestrial Carbon Storage: Mathematical Foundation and Its Applications

Trends and Drivers of Terrestrial Sources and Sinks of Carbon Dioxide: An Overview of the TRENDY Project

The Key Role of Forest Disturbance in Reconciling Estimates of the Northern Carbon Sink

Mapping carbon accumulation potential from global natural forest regrowth

Vegetation structural change since 1981 significantly enhanced the terrestrial carbon sink

Supplementary Material to "mapping Land-Use Fluxes for 2001–2020 from Global Models to National Inventories"