Abstract:Abstract Background: Previous lung cancer models were mostly based on case control studies and used limited epidemiological risk factors. The clinical utility was hampered due to lack of added value beyond smoking history. In this study, we developed a series of lung cancer risk prediction models using extensive data, including lab testing data, from a large prospective cohort in Taiwan. In particular, we developed a risk prediction model within heavy smokers with ≧30 pack years that could further stratify this group and improve the screening efficiency of Low Dose Computed Tomography (LDCT). Methods: The cohort participants were divided into equal training and validation sets, by using variables from personal history and standard lab tests. Cox proportional hazards regression and goodness of fit were used to generate area under the curve (AUC). Results: A total of 1,774 incident lung cancer cases were identified among 505,030 participants recruited in a 14-year period during 1994-2007. We developed a “History only” model that included smoking status, body mass index (BMI), family history, and personal history; a “lab only” model that included blood in sputum, lung function test and serum biomarkers like carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), bilirubin, and alpha fetoprotein (AFP); and an integrative model with all these variables. The AUC for “history only” model was 0.837, “lab only” model, 0.839, and integrative model, 0.862. We also developed integrative models for ever-smokers and never-smokers with AUCs of 0.872 and 0.801, respectively. Furthermore, since LDCT is recommended for heavy smokers with ≥ 30 smoking pack-years but with a high false positive rate, we developed a risk model in this group to further stratify this group. A total of 454 incident lung cancer cases were identified among 23,582 heavy smokers. Six variables are significantly associated with lung cancer risk: age, smoking status (current or former), smoking intensity (number of packs smoked in a day), BMI, lung function test and CEA. Current smokers, who smoked >1 pack per day, with BMI <25, lowest lung function and highest CEA, had the highest risk. The number of smokers needed to screen to identify one lung cancer (NNS) could decrease to 13 in this high-risk heavy smokers group from 52 in heavy smokers as a whole, a four-fold increase in risk identification. Highest risks were found among smokers with CEA ≧3.8 ug/L (NNS between 13 and 37) and smokers with lung function MMF<43 ml/sec (NNS between 13 and 25). Conclusion: Routinely collected lab data can significantly improve lung cancer risk prediction models. An integrative lung cancer risk prediction model among heavy smokers with ≧30 pack years can stratify subjects with a 3-4 fold difference in lung cancer risk for LDCT screening. The model found decreased lung function and high CEA values, along with detailed smoking history and low BMI, offered a unique predictive ability to improve the efficiency of LDCT screening. Citation Format: Xifeng Wu, Chi Pang Wen, Yuanqing Ye, MinKwang Tsai, Xia Pu, Wong-Ho Chow, Chad Huff, Sonia Cunningham, Maosheng Huang, Shiuan Bei Wu, Chwen Keng Tsao, Jian Gu. The use of lung cancer risk prediction model to stratify heavy smokers: The power of routinely collected lab data. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 105th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2014 Apr 5-9; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2014;74(19 Suppl):Abstract nr LB-298. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2014-LB-298

Author Correction: Personalized Risk Assessment in Never, Light, and Heavy Smokers in a Prospective Cohort in Taiwan

Corrigendum: Risk perceptions and changes in tobacco use in relation to Coronavirus Disease 2019 pandemic: A qualitative study on adolescent tobacco users in Hong Kong

Risk-stratified Approach for Never- and Ever-Smokers in Lung Cancer Screening: A Prospective Cohort Study in China

Corrigendum: Construction and Validation of a Lung Cancer Risk Prediction Model for Non-Smokers in China

Abstract LB-298: the Use of Lung Cancer Risk Prediction Model to Stratify Heavy Smokers: the Power of Routinely Collected Lab Data

Lung Cancer Risk Prediction Models for Asian Ever-Smokers.

Corrigendum to "Potential pre-COPD indicators in association with COPD development and COPD prediction models in Chinese: a prospective cohort study" [The Lancet Regional Health - Western Pacific 44 (2024) 100984].

Smoking and Genetic Risk Variation Across Populations of European, Asian, and African American Ancestry-A Meta-Analysis of Chromosome 15Q25

Risk perceptions and smoking decisions of adult Chinese men.

Correction: COVID-19 risk and outcomes in patients with substance use disorders: analyses from electronic health records in the United States

Lung Cancer Risk Score for Ever and Never Smokers in China.

Correction: Long-term bone and lung consequences associated with hospital-acquired severe acute respiratory syndrome: a 15-year follow-up from a prospective cohort study

Smoking Cessation, Weight Change, and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease.

Publisher Correction: Systemic Inflammation is Associated with Incident Stroke and Heart Disease in East Asians.

Corrigendum: Arsenic exposure and lung fibrotic changes-evidence from a longitudinal cohort study and experimental models

Corrigendum: Association between exposure to tobacco information through mass media, smoking households and secondhand smoke exposure in adolescents: Survey data from South Korea

A risk model for prediction of lung cancer.

Author Correction: The effects of acarbose therapy on reductions of myocardial infarction and all-cause death in T2DM during 10-year multifactorial interventions (The Beijing Community Diabetes Study 24)

Corrigendum to “sex Differences in HIV Treatment Outcomes and Adherence by Exposure Groups among Adults in Guangdong, China: A Retrospective Observational Cohort Study” [eclinicalmedicine 22 (2020) 100351]

[Exploratory Research on Developing Lung Cancer Risk Prediction Model in Female Non-Smokers].

Risk profiles for smoke behavior in COVID-19: a classification and regression tree analysis approach