Vertebrae rotation made little difference on the position of abdomial aorta relative to spine in adult degenerative scoliosis

Yan Liang,Shuai Xu,Zhenqi Zhu,Haiying Liu,Fanqi Meng
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-19818/v1
2020-01-01
Abstract:Abstract Background: Few study has been published for quantitative relation of the vertebrae rotation on the position of the aorta relative to spine in adult degenerative scoliosis (ADS). Thus, this study was to explore the effect of the vertebrae rotation on the position of the abdomial aorta relative to spine in patients with ADS and identify the risk factor of vertebrae rotation.Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed for 71 patients with ADS divided into left scoliosis (LS group, 40cases) and right scoliosis (RS group, 31cases). The two group were well-matched in demographics. Apical vertebrae, Cobb angle (°), coronal displacement and thoracolumbar kyphosis (TLK) were measured on X-ray. Aorta-vertebrae angle (α), aorta-vertebrae distance (d) and rotation angle (γ) for each level of T12-L4 on MRI were obtained within a Cartesian coordinate system.Result: There was no significant difference in apical vertebrae distribution between the LS and RS group, so were Cobb angle and coronal horizontal displacement distance (P˃0.05). There was no significance on mean γ of of apical vertebrae among different levels in LS group and RS group (P ˃0.05). Pearson correlation analysis showed γ was a positively correlated to Cobb angle and coronal horizontal displacement distance (P<0.001) in both groups. There was no significant correlation between the γ and α, d, whichever the group (P˃0.05). Coronal movement was the independent risk factor of γ in LS group with the equation of γ = -4.502+0.542×Coronal movement while Cobb angle and coronal horizontal movement were risk factors in RS group with γ = 2.953-0.512×Cobb angle -0.406×Coronal movement.Conclusion: Vertebral rotation could be predicted by Cobb angle or coronal movement by X-ray in ADS and aorta maintained a relatively normal position in patients with ADS.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?