Development and validation of a survival model based on autophagy-associated genes for predicting prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma

Wanli Yang,Liaoran Niu,Xinhui Zhao,Lili Duan,Yiding Li,Xiaoqian Wang,Yujie Zhang,Wei Zhou,Jinqiang Liu,Qingchuan Zhao,Yu Han,Daiming Fan,Liu Hong
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-31172/v1
2020-01-01
Abstract:Abstract Background: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the devastating tumors with increasing incidence. Autophagy-associated genes (ARGs) are widely participated in the cellular processes of HCC. This study proposed to identify the novel prognostic gene signature based on ARGs in HCC. Methods: We downloaded the RNA sequencing data and clinical information of HCC and normal tissues from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database. The differentially expressed ARGs were screened by the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Functional enrichment analyses were conducted to explore the biological implications and mechanisms of ARGs in HCC. Cox regression analysis and Lasso regression analysis were performed to screen the ARGs which related to overall survival (OS). The OS-related ARGs were then used to establish a prognostic prediction model. Kaplan-Meier curves and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were both applied to evaluate the accuracy of the model. GSE14520 dataset was downloaded as the testing cohort to validate the prognostic risk model in TCGA. A nomogram based on the clinical features and risk signature was established to predict the 3-year and 5-year survival rate of HCC patients. Results: Totally 27 differentially expressed ARGs were screened in this study. Then, 3 OS-related ARGs (SQSTM1, HSPB8, and BIRC5) were identified via the Cox regression and Lasso regression analyses. Based on these 3 ARGs, a prognostic prediction model was constructed. HCC patients in high-risk group presented poorer prognosis than those with low risk score in TCGA cohort (3-year OS, 53.7% vs 70.2%; 5-year OS, 42.0 % vs 55.2%; P=4.478e-04) and in the testing group (3-year OS, 57.7% vs 73.5%; 5-year OS, 43.2% vs 63.0%; P=1.274e-03). The risk score curve showed a well feasibility in predicting the patients’ survival both in TCGA and GEO cohort with the area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.756 and 0.672, respectively. Besides, the calibration curves and C-index indicated that the clinical nomogram performs well to predict the 3-year and 5-year survival rate in HCC patients. Conclusions: The survival model based on the ARGs may be a promising tool to predict the prognosis in HCC patients.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?