Redox signaling and antioxidant therapies in acute respiratory distress syndrome

Liyan Bo,Faguang Jin,Zhuang Ma,Congcong Li
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-48069/v1
2020-01-01
Abstract:Abstract Despite extensive research conducted to explore the mechanism of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), no pharmacologic treatment that targets the pathophysiologic alterations has proven effective. Previous studies have revealed overactive oxidative stress as a potential therapeutic target. However, there are still some discrepancies, and thus we conducted this systematic review to assess the efficacy and safety of antioxidant therapy on the clinical outcomes of ARDS patients. Methods: We retrieved potentially relevant clinical trials from the electronic databases. Articles and conference abstracts about antioxidant therapies for patients with ARDS were identified in which the overall effect of each antioxidant therapy on the mortality of ARDS patients was summarized. Results: We identified 18 relevant studies, including 899 patients in the experimental group and 870 patients in the control group, and these were included in the meta-analysis. The antioxidant strategies including albumin, N-acetylcysteine (NAC), selenium, vitamin C, Oxothiazolidine-4-carboxylic acid, and lisofylline. The pooled results indicated that most of the antioxidant therapies could not improve the all-cause mortality and might have been even harmful in ARDS patients at low risk of death. Conclusions: Unclassified patients could not benefit from the antioxidant therapies, and thus discretion must be exercised when using these therapies. However, some treatments had a positive effect on ARDS patients at a high risk of death and early antioxidant treatment might be associated with reduced mortality when compared with delayed treatment.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?