Guidelines Translation for Distress Management in Cancer Patients Based on CAN-IMPLEMENT: Adaptation Part

Liang Fu,Yang Yang,Yan Hu,Zhenqi Lu,Xiaoju Zhang,Mingzhu Huang,Yuanyuan Li,Fuzhong Zhu,Yang Wang,Zhe Huang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-53486/v1

2020-01-01

Abstract:Abstract Background Almost all cancer patients experience some level of distress, which has significantly reduced their quality of life. Nowadays evidence-based practice in various fields of health care is increasing, and it has played an important role. This study aimed to clarify the theme of guideline adaptation, integrate relevant clinical practice guidelines on distress management in cancer patients, and develop the Cancer-related Distress Management Guidelines. Methods A Guideline Adaptation and Implementation Planning Resource (CAN-IMPLEMENT) was used as the research framework, which include three phases. Here the Adaptation Part (Phase 1) was reported: adaptation of relevant clinical practice guidelines on the distress management in cancer patients to form the Cancer-related Distress Management Guidelines. Results The physical symptom distress score (0.61 ± 0.58) was almost equal to the psychological symptom distress score (0.61 ± 0.70) among cancer patients in Shanghai. A work plan for the adaptation of Cancer-related Distress Management Guidelines was developed. Two clinical practice guidelines related to distress management in cancer patents were included after searching, screening, assessment and selection. The domain scores of the draft the Cancer-related Distress Management Guidelines on Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II (AGREE II) were 80.00% (scope and purpose), 82.78% (stakeholder involvement), 87.50% (rigour of development), 73.89% (clarity and presentation), 73.75% (applicability), 87.50% (editorial independence) respectively. The scores of most recommendations on feasibility, appropriateness, meaningfulness and effectiveness were 90.0% or higher. The final guidelines included 13 recommendations. Conclusions The psychological symptoms and physical symptoms were both worthy of attention in cancer patients. The quality of the draft the Cancer-related Distress Management Guidelines was well-accepted based on two included guidelines. Most recommendations received positive and constructive feedback on feasibility, appropriateness, meaningfulness and effectiveness. The final guidelines was formed based on the revision of the first draft guidelines.