Abstract:Differential privacy (DP), as a rigorous mathematical definition quantifying privacy leakage, has become a well-accepted standard for privacy protection. Combined with powerful machine learning (ML) techniques, differentially private machine learning (DPML) is increasingly important. As the most classic DPML algorithm, DP-SGD incurs a significant loss of utility, which hinders DPML's deployment in practice. Many studies have recently proposed improved algorithms based on DP-SGD to mitigate utility loss. However, these studies are isolated and cannot comprehensively measure the performance of improvements proposed in algorithms. More importantly, there is a lack of comprehensive research to compare improvements in these DPML algorithms across utility, defensive capabilities, and generalizability. We fill this gap by performing a holistic measurement of improved DPML algorithms on utility and defense capability against membership inference attacks (MIAs) on image classification tasks. We first present a taxonomy of where improvements are located in the ML life cycle. Based on our taxonomy, we jointly perform an extensive measurement study of the improved DPML algorithms, over twelve algorithms, four model architectures, four datasets, two attacks, and various privacy budget configurations. We also cover state-of-the-art label differential privacy (Label DP) algorithms in the evaluation. According to our empirical results, DP can effectively defend against MIAs, and sensitivity-bounding techniques such as per-sample gradient clipping play an important role in defense. We also explore some improvements that can maintain model utility and defend against MIAs more effectively. Experiments show that Label DP algorithms achieve less utility loss but are fragile to MIAs. ML practitioners may benefit from these evaluations to select appropriate algorithms. To support our evaluation, we implement a modular re-usable software, DPMLBench,(1) which enables sensitive data owners to deploy DPML algorithms and serves as a benchmark tool for researchers and practitioners.

BiSample: Bidirectional Sampling for Handling Missing Data with Local Differential Privacy

Locally Private Sampling with Public Data

Local Differential Privacy for data collection and analysis

Distributed Differential Privacy By Sampling

APLDP: Adaptive personalized local differential privacy data collection in mobile crowdsensing

Local Differential Privacy and Its Applications: A Comprehensive Survey

Minimax Optimal Two-Sample Testing under Local Differential Privacy

DPMLBench: Holistic Evaluation of Differentially Private Machine Learning

AAA: an Adaptive Mechanism for Locally Differential Private Mean Estimation

Joint Distribution Analysis for Set-Valued Data With Local Differential Privacy

Collecting Multi-type and Correlation-Constrained Streaming Sensor Data with Local Differential Privacy

On robustness and local differential privacy

Benchmarking Secure Sampling Protocols for Differential Privacy

Smoothed Differential Privacy

A Comprehensive Survey on Local Differential Privacy toward Data Statistics and Analysis

AdaPDP: Adaptive Personalized Differential Privacy.

(Local) Differential Privacy has NO Disparate Impact on Fairness

Local Differential Private Data Aggregation for Discrete Distribution Estimation

PrivBV: Distance-aware Encoding for Distributed Data with Local Differential Privacy

Learning with User-Level Local Differential Privacy

FLDP: Flexible strategy for local differential privacy