Abstract:A key challenge for Earth system models is improving the representation of plant functional diversity. Experiments with vegetation demographic models show that water limitation leads to divergence between tree allocation strategies that are most competitive versus those that maximize biomass or productivity in monoculture. Earth system models (ESMs) have a limited capacity to represent plant functional diversity and shifts in trait distributions. Approaches to improving the representation of this complexity in ESMs include (i) optimality‐based approaches that predict trait–environment responses and (ii) explicitly modelling coexistence and community assembly. These approaches are expected to converge only when optimality‐based approaches identify competitively dominant strategies, which often differ from strategies that maximize ecosystem functioning or fitness components in monoculture. We used two models, LM3‐PPA (a vegetation demographic model designed as an ESM component) and BiomeE (a computationally efficient analog for LM3‐PPA), to explore how water limitation affects carbon allocation strategies of canopy trees. We compared competitive allocation strategies and those that maximize biomass or productivity in monoculture. We did not explicitly model coexistence or community assembly. Rather, we used model experiments to identify competitive and maximizing strategies in a two‐dimensional trait space under different precipitation and mortality scenarios. At 10 eastern US locations, we simulated historical, wet and dry climate scenarios, novel drought and three different mortality scenarios (low, medium or high sensitivity to water deficit). For each site and scenario, we identified the competitive strategy and three maximizing strategies (maximum biomass, productivity or drought‐tolerance). Root: leaf ratios tended to increase and leaf area tended to decrease with increasing water stress (increasing water limitation and its effects on mortality). However, relative to maximizing strategies, competitive strategies shifted towards greater allocation to roots and leaves with increasing water stress. Competitive overinvestments (greater allocation to roots and leaves by competitive strategies compared with maximizing strategies) were robust across different modelling contexts, including vegetation parameter sets (Acer vs. Populus), models (LM3‐PPA vs. BiomeE) and uncalibrated vsersus calibrated BiomeE versions. Synthesis: The theoretical prediction that competitive and maximizing allocation strategies differ under water limitation is confirmed for a demographic model designed as an ESM component. Optimality‐based trait predictions can simplify representing trait diversity in ESMs but do not always correspond to competitive outcomes. Explicitly modelling coexistence and community assembly in ESMs is challenging but is likely the most general approach to representing trait diversity.

Effect of Water Exchange Rate on Interspecies Competition Between Submerged Macrophytes: Functional Trait Hierarchy Drives Competition

Effects of Water Exchange Rate on Morphological and Physiological Characteristics of Two Submerged Macrophytes from Erhai Lake

Competition between two wetland macrophytes under different levels of sediment saturation

Response of a submerged macrophyte (Vallisneria natans) to water depth gradients and sediment nutrient concentrations

Interspecific competition alters water use patterns of coexisting plants in a desert ecosystem

Effects of Resource Heterogeneity and Environmental Disturbance on the Growth Performance and Interspecific Competition of Wetland Clonal Plants

Experimental Evidence That Water-Exchange Unevenness Affects Individual Characteristics of Two Wetland Macrophytes Phalaris Arundinacea and Polygonum Hydropiper

Competition and facilitation of two wetland macrophytes under different water levels and nutrient-heterogeneous conditions

Competition and Facilitation in Three Marsh Plants in Response to a Water-Level Gradient

Which Has a Greater Impact on Plant Functional Traits: Plant Source or Environment?

Inferior plant competitor allocates more biomass to belowground as a result of greater competition for resources in heterogeneous habitats

Competition Between Potamogeton Malaianus and Hydrilla Verticillata in Response to Different Water Level Conditions

Influence of surface water and groundwater on functional traits and trade-off strategies of oasis communities at the end of the Keriya River, China

Nutrient enrichment, propagule pressure, and herbivory interactively influence the competitive ability of an invasive alien macrophyte Myriophyllum aquaticum

Fluctuated water depth with high nutrient concentrations promote the invasiveness of Wedelia trilobata in Wetland

Water depth affects submersed macrophyte more than herbivorous snail in mesotrophic lakes

Effects of water limitation and competition on tree carbon allocation in an Earth system modelling framework

Effects of water level on intra-and inter-specific relationships of Spartina anglica and Scirpus triqueter

Allocation to Clonal and Sexual Reproduction and Its Plasticity in Vallisneria Spinulosa along a Water‐depth Gradient

Distinct responses of niche and fitness differences to water availability underlie variable coexistence outcomes in semi‐arid annual plant communities

Responses of leaf functional traits to different hydrological regimes and leaf economics spectrum in the water level fluctuation zone of Three Gorges Reservoir, China