Clitoris to Urethral Meatus Distance is Not Affected by the Obesity Compared to the Anogenital Distance

Zheng Li,Meng-jiao Xu,Hong Xia,Huai-fang Li,Binggen Zhu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-230184/v1
2021-01-01
Abstract:Abstract Background The distance between clitoris and urethral meatus (CUMD) for women has been considered to likely reflect the extent of prenatal androgen exposure, being similar to the anogenital distance (AGD) and the digit length ratio. But no published work has examined the association between the CUMD and the AGD or digit ratio and the effect of body weight on CUMD and AGD.Methods The CUMD and AGD (including AGD-AC, from the anus to the anterior clitoris; AGD-AF, from the anus to the posterior fourchette) measurements for 117 women (18-45 years) were taken using a digital caliper, and the digit ratios were measured from photos by a digital camera. Meanwhile, data of their height, weight, and body mass index (BMI) were collected at same time. Results In bivariate correlation analyses of all 117 subjects, two AGD measurements (AGD-AC and AGD-AF) were moderately correlated with one another (r=0.474, p<0.001), but the correlation between AGD-AC and CUMD was weak (r=0.172, p=0.063). Both AGD-AC and AGD-AF were notably correlated with weight (r=0.290, p=0.002 and r=0.189, p=0.041; respectively) and BMI (r=0.341, p<0.001 and r=0.204, p=0.027; respectively), whereas the CUMD was not affected by weight or BMI. Exclusion of obese individuals, the CUMD of 86 non-overweight subjects was obviously correlated with the AGD-AC (r=0.236, p=0.028). Conclusion These results indicated that the CUMD could be a marker of prenatal androgen exposure without influence of body weight, superior to AGD-AC or AGD-AF.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?