Abstract:Objective: To investigate the feasibility and safety of a robotic surgical system (or laparoscopy) in combination with colonoscopy (combined) for the treatment of stage T1N0M0 colorectal cancer. Methods: This was a descriptive case series. Indications for combined dual-scope surgery in this study were as follows: (1) preoperative colonoscopic examination of lesions in the middle and upper rectum and colon with pathologically confirmed high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia, intramucosal adenocarcinoma, or adenocarcinoma; (2) no distant or local lymph node metastases; and (3) endoscopic ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging evidence of tumor invasion of the mucosal or submucosal, but not the muscular, layer (i.e., T1). The clinical data of 13 patients with stage T1 colorectal cancer who had undergone dual-scope combined resection using a robotic surgery system or laparoscope-assisted combined colonoscopy surgery at the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University from April to October 2022 were retrospectively collected, including 6 males and 7 females, with a median age of 59 (48~88) years old. The tumors were located in the upper and middle rectum in six patients, in the sigmoid colon in three, and in the ascending colon in four. The median maximum diameter of the tumors was 3.0 (1.8-5.0) cm. The surgery was performed by a robotic surgery system (or laparoscopy) with peritumoral D1 lymph node dissection at the first station in the tumor area. The tumors were resected under direct vision and the defects in the intestinal wall were using a robotic surgery system (or laparoscopy). A robotic surgery system was combined with colonoscopy in eight cases and laparoscopy combined with colonoscopy in the remaining five. Studied variables includes surgical and pathological features, postoperative factors, and outcomes. Results: Surgery was successful in all 13 patients with no need for conversion to open surgery or intraoperative blood transfusion. The median operating time was 85 (60-120) minutes, median intraoperative bleeding 3 (2-5) mL, median number of lymph nodes harvested 3 (1-5), and the median circumferential resection margin 0.8 (0.5-1.0) cm. Postoperative pathological examination showed lymph node metastasis in one patient, who therefore underwent additional radical surgery. The median postoperative time to ambulation was 1 (1-2) days. The urinary catheters of all patients were removed 1 day after surgery and the median length of stay was 4 (3-5) days. No abdominal infection, anastomotic leakage or bleeding occurred in any of the study patients. The median follow-up time was 10 (6-12) months, during which no tumor recurrence or metastasis was found, and the quality of life was satisfactory. Conclusions: The combination of two minimally invasive platforms, a robotic surgery system (or laparoscopy) and colonoscopy, is safe and feasible for resection of stage T1 colorectal cancer and has a good short-term prognosis.

The application of robot-assisted natural orifice specimen extraction surgery in the combined with multiple organ resection in rectal cancer

Robotic colorectal resection with hand-sewn anastomosis of the digestive tract and nature orifice specimen extraction

Robot-assisted natural orifice specimen extraction surgery for radical resection of colorectal cancer

Comparison of transabdominal wall specimen retrieval and natural orifice specimen extraction robotic surgery in the outcome of colorectal cancer treatment

[Application of robotic (or laparoscopic) surgery combined with colonoscopy in T1 stage colorectal cancer surgery: 13 cases]

Case report: dual primary malignancies treated by laparoscopic multiorgan resection with natural orifice specimen extraction surgery

Comparison of natural orifice specimen extraction surgery and conventional laparoscopic-assisted resection in the treatment effects of low rectal cancer

Progress, challenges, and future perspectives of robot-assisted natural orifice specimen extraction surgery for colorectal cancer: a review

Clinical outcomes and prognostic factors of robotic assisted rectal cancer resection alone versus robotic rectal cancer resection with natural orifice extraction: a matched analysis

Clinical application of robot-assisted surgical system in the simultaneous radial resection of colorectal liver metastases

Evaluating Short-Term and Survival Outcomes of Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction Surgery for Colorectal Cancer: A Single-Centre Retrospective Study

The feasibility, safety and short-term clinical efficacy of laparoscopic anterior resection of rectal cancer with left colonic artery (LCA) preservation and natural orifice specimen extraction (NOSE)

Retrospective Study of 718 Colorectal Neoplasms Treated by Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction Surgery in 79 Hospitals

Comparison of robotic-assisted and laparoscopic-assisted natural orifice specimen extraction surgery in short-terms outcomes of middle rectal cancer

Robot-assisted one-stage resection of rectal cancer with liver and lung metastases.

Retrospective analysis of immediate and long-term results of NOSES technique and conventional laparoscopic-assisted resection in patients with colorectal cancer

Comparison of efficacy between natural orifice specimen extraction without abdominal incision and conventional laparoscopic surgery in the treatment of sigmoid colon cancer and upper rectal cancer

Efficacy of natural duct specimen extraction versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer: a single-centre retrospective analysis

Comparative analysis of safety and effectiveness between natural orifice specimen extraction and conventional transabdominal specimen extraction in robot-assisted colorectal cancer resection through systematic review and meta-analysis

Robot-assisted resection of colorectal cancer: a comparison of preliminary results with traditional laparoscopic

Simultaneous laparoscopic colectomy and liver metastasectomy with natural orifice specimen extraction: A proof-of-concept study