Genomic Signatures Define Three Subtypes of EGFR-Mutant Stage II-III NSCLC With Distinct Adjuvant Therapy Outcomes

Si-Yang Liu,Hua Bao,Qun Wang,Weimin Mao,Yedan Chen,Xiaoling Tong,Song-Tao Xu,Lin Wu,Yu-Cheng Wei,Yong-Yu Liu,Chun Chen,Ying Cheng,Rong Yin,Fan Yang,Shengxiang Ren,Xiao-Fei Li,Jian Li,Cheng Huang,Zhidong Liu,Shun Xu,Ke-Neng Chen,Shi-Dong Xu,Lunxu Liu,Ping Yu,Bu-Hai Wang,Haitao Ma,Hong-hong Yan,Song Dong,Xu-Chao Zhang,Jian Su,Jin-Ji Yang,Xue-Ning Yang,Qing Zhou,Xue Wu,Yang Shao,Wen-Zhao Zhong,Yi-Long Wu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-457070/v1
2021-01-01
Abstract:Abstract The ADJUVANT study reported the comparative superiority of adjuvant gefitinib over chemotherapy in disease-free survival (DFS) of resected EGFR-mutant stage II-IIIA non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, not all patients experienced favorable clinical outcomes with TKI, raising the necessity for further biomarker assessment. By comprehensive genomic profiling of 171 tumor tissues from the ADJUVANT trial, five predictive biomarkers were identified (TP53 exon4/5 mutations, RB1 alterations, and copy number gains of NKX2-1, CDK4, and MYC. Then we integrated them into the Multiple-gene INdex to Evaluate the Relative benefit of Various Adjuvant therapies (MINERVA) score, which categorized patients into three subgroups with relative disease-free survival and overall survival benefits from either adjuvant gefitinib or chemotherapy (Highly TKI-Preferable, TKI-Preferable, and Chemotherapy-Preferable groups). This study demonstrates that predictive genomic signatures could potentially stratify resected EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients and provide precise guidance towards future personalized adjuvant therapy.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?