The Milan Campaign: Studying the Sea Surface Microlayer

Christian Stolle,Mariana Ribas-Ribas,Thomas H. Badewien,Jonathan Barnes,Lucy J. Carpenter,Rosie Chance,Lars Riis Damgaard,Ana Maria Duran Quesada,Anja Engel,Sanja Frka,Luisa Galgani,Blazenka Gasparovic,Michaela Gerriets,Nur Ili Hamizah Mustaffa,Hartmut Herrmann,Liisa Kallajoki,Ryan Pereira,Franziska Radach,Niels Peter Revsbech,Philippa Rickard,Adam Saint,Matthew Salter,Maren Striebel,Nadja Triesch,Guenther Uher,Robert C. Upstill-Goddard,Manuela van Pinxteren,Birthe Zancker,Paul Zieger,Oliver Wurl
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1175/bams-d-17-0329.a
IF: 9.116
2020-01-01
Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society
Abstract:a broad of oce-anic regions and phytoplankton will stimulate further diel studies of air–sea interface processes. In light of the global importance of matter and energy exchange across the SML, the focus of these studies should be on improving our understanding of the long-and short-term effects of climate change. We predict that in a future ocean, changes in wind regimes, radiation intensities, and precipitation rates will greatly modify SML properties, leading to subsequent altered feedbacks affect-ing many aspects of air–sea interaction. Based on measurements from drifting buoy instruments, box-and-whisker plots show the gas transfer velocities of CO 2 ( k ; cm h –1 ) for (a) day and night, where no significant difference is found. But separating wind observations into (b) different speed bins helps show one of the important findings of MILAN—the significant day–night difference in (c) at low wind speed.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?