Patient self-regulation and functioning in schizophrenia.
E. Hamera,K. Peterson,S. M. Handley,A. A. Plumlee,E. Frank-Ragan
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1176/PS.42.6.630
1991-06-01
Abstract:schizophrenia at least two years pre viously were interviewed between December 1987 and May 1988. Pa tients with secondary diagnoses of substance abuse, mental retardation, or organicity were excluded. Two-thirds of the patients in the sample were male, and 90 percent were Caucasian. Their mean age was 33.5 years, and they had a mean of 12.6 years of education. Thirty-five percent were employed either full time or part time, and 7 1 percent resided in unsupervised living situa tions. The majority of subjects (63 percent) had a diagnosis ofa paranoid subtype ofschizophrenia, all were on antipsychotic medications, and all were being closely monitored by a case manager. In addition, some at tended group activities at CSS. The interviews were conducted using the Self-Regulation Interview for Schizophrenia adapted from our previous work (2). In the open-ended interview, administered by two of the investigators, subjects were asked if they knew when they were becoming ill; if they said yes, they were asked how they knew. From the list of indicators reported, subjects were asked to select one that they particularly noticed. This primary indicator was then coded into one of three categories—anxiety, depres sion, or psychosis—based on the stages of decompensation described by Docherty and associates (9). In the interview, subjects were also asked what they did, if anything, when they experienced their primary indicator. The actions reported were coded two ways. First, they were grouped by whether or not they in volved contacting health care profes sionals or taking prescribed medica tions (medical versus nonmedical ac tions). Second, the actions were grouped into self-defeating behav iors (use ofdnugs on alcohol or acting out) and other actions. Interrater reliability for the ne sponses to the self-regulation inter view, assessed independently by two of the investigators, ranged from 89 to 100 percent. Likewise, intcrcoder reliability for primary indicators and action categories ranged from 96 to 100 percent. Edna K. Hamera, R.N., Ph.D. Kathryn A. Peterson, R.N., M.S. Sandra M. Handley, R.N., Ph.D. Ardyce A. Plumlee, R.N., M.N. Elaine Frank-Ragan, R.N., M.S.N.