Construction and Confirmatory Factor Analysis of Panoramic Quality Assessment Tool for Investigator-Initiated Trials

Wenwen Lv,Tingting Hu,Jiayuan Jiang,Tiantian Qu,Enlu Shen,Jiacheng Duan,Xin Miu,Weituo Zhang,Biyun Qian

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-620533/v1

2021-01-01

Abstract:Abstract Introduction. Investigator initiated trials (IITs) are laid on the optimization and improvement of already existing therapies or treatment approaches and attempts to answer problems faced by clinicians in their daily practice. However, the quality assessment for conducting these sometimes complex studies is scarce of evidence. Our study aims at developing a handy quality assessment tool for IITs and providing investigators with resources to conduct their studies effectively. Furthermore, patient safety and data quality will also be kept as top priorities.Data and methods. The framework of the quality assessment tool was based on the literature studies and accepted guidelines and the Delphi method. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) is used to further evaluate the validity and feasibility of the conceptual quality assessment tool. Results. The panorama quality assessment tool for IITs contains four critical quality attributes, including progress, quality, regulation, scientificity, and 13 observed quality indexes. 272 IITs were collected, finally, 252 IITs were included in the validity and feasibility assessment. The majority of the studies (60.29%) were in Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT), and 41.18% of the studies were multi-center. In order to test for validity and feasibility of IITs quality assessment tool, CFA method was showed a fit for the model (CMIN/DF=1.868, GFI=0.916; CFI=0.936; TLI=0.919; RMSEA=0.063). Multiple types of studies of clinical studies, including RCT, prospective cohort study, retrospective, and real-world research fitted well in the tool by assessing their subject management, reasonable clinical research methods, and quality control methods. However, RCT ended with lower scores than prospective cohort study, retrospective and real-world research in enrollment progress (7.02 vs. 7.43, 9.63, 7.85, respectively). Conclusions. The panorama tool for overall quality assessment of IITs from this study combines the advantages of both qualitative and quantitative recognized evaluation indexes, which are further validated by CFA. The panorama evaluation tool can timely and dynamically find errors, take actions to prevent major bias. It is hoped that this framework can provide project management departments with resources for effective and dynamic management of their research and avoid waste of resources, as well as a manner to improve the quality of IIT in the future.