Exploring the Influence of 34S Fractionation from Emission Sources and SO2 Atmospheric Oxidation on Sulfate Source Apportionment Based on Hourly Resolution 34S-SO2/SO42-

Xinxin Feng,Yingjun Chen,Zeyu Liu,Yanli Feng,Huiyun Du,Yujing Mu,Jianmin Chen
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1029/2023jd038595
2023-01-01
Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres
Abstract:Sulfate (SO42-) sources are unclear leading to the underestimation of its concentration in the model. Hourly resolution d(34)S-SO2 and d(34)S-SO42- values of three haze episodes (EP1-EP3) were synchronously collected for the first time to quantify the influence of S-34 fractionation from emission sources (e.g., coal combustion) and SO2 atmospheric oxidation on SO2/SO42- source apportionment. After considering the S-34 fractionation from coal combustion and atmospheric oxidation, the reasonable and logical source contributions of SO42- were obtained, showing highly consistent with that of Positive Matrix Factorization model results. Considering the S-34 fraction from atmospheric oxidation, the source apportionment of SO2/SO42- obtained by hourly resolution d(34)S-SO2 and d(34)S-SO42- can more accurately reflect the dynamic changes of emission sources. Traffic emissions (49%) and coal combustion (46%-65%) were the major contributors to SO2/SO42- in EP1 and EP2-EP3, respectively. However, obvious deviations of coal combustion contribution were found without considering S-34 fractionation from coal combustion. Especially for the northwest transmission channels in EP2-EP3, the deviation values accounted for 17.1%-38.5% of secondary SO42-. Moreover, d(34)S was considered as a more sensitive source indicator than SO2 concentration by the results comparison of S-34 technique and air quality model (Nested Air Quality Prediction Model System), which can provide more reliable evidence for SO2 emission control.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?