Techno-economic Comparison of Cooling Storage and Battery for Electricity Flexibility at Long and Short Timescales in Buildings

Qi Chen,Zhonghong Kuang,Xiaohua Liu,Tao Zhang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2023.117183
IF: 10.4
2023-01-01
Energy Conversion and Management
Abstract:Cooling storage and batteries are the most ubiquitous types of thermal and electrical energy storage technologies in buildings; thus, their techno-economic comparisons can assist in deciding appropriate installation and maintaining efficient operation. The ratio of battery capacity to cooling storage capacity for achieving the same electricity flexibility, referred to as the discount ratio, can quantify long- and short-term technical differences between two storage methods. In the long term, namely during the cooling season, the flexible performance of cooling storage decreases as capacity increases, with an average discount ratio of 0.44-0.93 in a typical office building. Meanwhile, cooling storage should be invested before batteries due to the economic advantage, and the optimal cooling storage capacity is 25% of the design-day cooling load. The short-term metric quantifies the daily dispatch capability of cooling storage, which is strongly positively correlated with the share of cooling load. Furthermore, wind power but not photovoltaics can individually enhance the flexibility of cooling storage. In general, renewable energy facilitates the utilization of cooling storage: The optimal capacity with 50% wind and 40% solar penetration rises to 2.8 times the optimal capacity without renewables. Finally, the research estimates the application potential in various Chinese provinces and concludes that most regions are suitable, yet necessitate extra portable energy storage in non-cooling season.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?