Abstract:Purpose The modern construction industry is highly competitive and cost driven, with tangible adversarial relationships between projects' contractual parties at individual and organisational levels; there are conflict of interest as people to survive. Accordingly, team leaders on construction megaprojects (CMPs) in multinational engineering organisations strive to survive in such competitive markets. The research's aim is to investigate relationships between team leaders' tenure and management styles towards professional subordinates on CMPs and elaborate how corporate governance can optimally address this conflict of interest and adversarial relationships. Design/methodology/approach The research methodology adopted processes of inducting theory using case studies. A qualitative approach was adopted as a primary data collection and analysis source. It involved case studies through primary data collection in semi-structured face-to-face interviews with 38 professional subordinates (interviewees) to discuss impacts of team leaders' tenure on their management style (a five-team leader, case studies). The research methodology is based on building theories from case study grounded theory research methodologies. Findings The research introduced the notion that team leader survival syndrome is pronounced and evidenced by adversarial reactions towards new or experienced professional subordinates where team leaders perceive professional subordinates, especially at senior technical levels, as potential risks that jeopardise their positions and employment survival possibilities. The syndrome is proven based on real-life case studies; it is constant, tangible and serious disorder of attitudes and behaviours. Longer tenure stimulates and accelerates these phenomena and syndrome, with 58% of team leaders exhibiting such syndromes. Optimum employee tenure is between 7 and 10 years. Corporate governance provides good resolution practices. Research limitations/implications The research implications are useful to construction industry and academia. However, the analysis is limited to the case studies considered in Canada and Qatar. Due to small sample size for both case studies and respondents to the questionnaire survey, it is recommended for future exploration to expand the scope of research to larger sample size and various demographic and geographical locations. Practical implications Corporates should acknowledge the presence of team leader survival syndromes. They should thoroughly investigate sociopolitical relationships behind it and seek to understand consequences on professional subordinates. Corporates should also adopt a 360-degree feedback system; they should limit trust given to team leaders in this regard to responsible trust, to eliminate manipulation. Team leaders are perceived as being not always truthful and misrepresent capabilities and performance of their professional subordinates to senior managers. Corporate governance holistic multidimensional perspectives are required to provide resolutions of team leader survival syndromes. Originality/value The research has discovered a phenomenon that team leaders on CMPs in architecture, engineering and construction (AEC) organisations, prompted by virtue of long tenure in corporates or by power of their managerial level in organisations, perceive their professional subordinates, especially senior technical employees, as potential risks. It is thought promoting them would put their own positions and security of tenure at risk. Hence, team leaders act adversarially, to enhance their own survival prospects. This research introduced the novel team leader survival syndrome and introduced analyses, practical implications and recommendations.

Leadership and Employee Well-Being in the Architecture, Engineering, and Construction (AEC) Industry

Theoretical model for mental health management of project management practitioners in architecture, engineering and construction (AEC) project organizations

Corporate sustainability for architecture engineering and construction (AEC) organizations: Framework, transition and implication strategies

Impact of AEC project organizational design on the mental health of project management practitioners (PMPs) in Australia

Ethical Leadership, Affective Commitment, Work Engagement, And Creativity: Testing A Multiple Mediation Approach

Study of factors affecting the performance of construction projects in AEC industry

Proposing a development framework for sustainable architecture, engineering, and construction industry in China: Challenges, best practice, and future directions

Team leader survival syndrome, tenure and management styles towards professional subordinates on construction megaprojects; sustainability and corporate governance

The Roles of Integrative Leadership in Enhancing Organizational Effectiveness in the Chinese Public Sector: A Research Note

Safety Leadership Effectiveness Assessment of Project Managers in the Construction Industry: A Case Study of China

Information and Communication Technology Applications in Architecture, Engineering, and Construction Organizations: A 15-Year Review

Digital technology-enabled AEC project management: practical use cases, deployment patterns and emerging trends

Legal Risks Faced by Foreign Architectural, Engineering, and Construction Firms in China

An Investigation of Construction Workforce Inequalities and Biases in the Architecture, Engineering, and Construction (AEC) Industry

Ethics of artificial intelligence and robotics in the architecture, engineering, and construction industry

Innovation Performance Indicators for Architecture, Engineering and Construction Organization

The Wisdom of the Collective: an Integrated Multi-Level Framework of Shared Leadership in Engineering Management Project Teams

Change management practices for adopting new technologies in the design and construction industry

Factors Affecting Workplace Well-Being: Building Construction Projects

A leadership-as-practice perspective on design in architecture, engineering and construction projects: interaction analysis of a collaborative workshop

Digital Technologies in the Architecture, Engineering and Construction (AEC) Industry—A Bibliometric—Qualitative Literature Review of Research Activities