Detoxification and Antioxidant Functions and Regulatory Mechanisms of Two Delta-class GSTs in Paddy Crayfish (procambarus Clarkii) after Imidacloprid Stress.

Yingping Gui,Maolin Feng,Wuting Lu,Yang Gang,Chungen Wen,Baoqing Hu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbpc.2023.109674
IF: 4.52
2023-01-01
Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part C Toxicology & Pharmacology
Abstract:Glutathione S-transferases (GSTs) are phase II metabolic detoxification enzymes, which are widely found in organisms, and play an important role in helping organisms to resist toxic compounds. In this study, the two Delta-class GSTs cDNA sequences were cloned from Procambarus clarkii (designated as PcGSTD1 and PcGSTD2). Tissue specific expression profile showed that PcGST1,2 were expressed in all 6 tissues, with the highest expression in hepatopancreas. Subcellular localization assay showed that PcGSTD1, 2 were mainly expressed in the cytoplasm of HEK-293 T cells. Recombinant PcGSTD1, 2 showed the highest catalytic activity to the GST model substrate 1-chloro-2,4-dinitrobenzene (CDNB) at 20 and 30 degrees C, pH 8 and 7, respectively. The mRNA expression of PcGSTD1, 2 and the GSTs activity varied with the time of imidacloprid challenge. The BL21(DE3) expressing PcGSTD1, 2 proteins could more resistant to H2O2. The dsRNA experiments showed that PcKeap1b, PcNrf1, and PcMafK affected the transcription levels of PcGSTD1, 2. The GST-Pulldown results revealed that PcbZIP and PcMafK recombinant proteins could bind to each other in vitro. The gel mobility shift assay demonstrated that PcMafK recombinant protein had affinity with the promoter of PcGSTD2. The Dual luciferase assays analyzed the activity of the promoters after different truncations, the core region of PcGSTD1 promoter was at -440 bp to +54 bp, and that of PcGSTD2 promoter was between - 1609 similar to-1125 bp. These results suggested that PcGSTD1, 2 respond positively to imidacloprid stress in P. clarkii, and the transcriptional ex-pressions of PcGSTD1, 2 were influenced by the factors of PcKeap1b/PcNrf1/PcMafK.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?